2013
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient process and optimal design of receiver coil for small‐loop transient electromagnetics

Abstract: Distributed parameters of the receiver coils greatly affect transient electromagnetic signals over short time periods, causing a delay in the signal's effective sampling time and the loss of shallow exploration information. This paper investigates the influence of transient process on apparent resistivity calculation and analyses the relations between the error of apparent resistivity and receiver coil design. We find that, under the same effective area, different radii of the receiver coils lead to different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. We observe that the magnetic intensity value at point 1, 5,9,13, and 17, which lies in the center of the grounding mesh, is much higher than that at other points; whereas the magnetic intensity value at point 3, 7, 11, and 15, which lies right above the grounding conductor, is significantly smaller than that at other points when grounding grids have no fault. In situation 2, the magnetic intensity value at point 8, 9 and 10 which lies within the corrosion mesh has a maximal drop of about 5.81%, while that at other points has no significant change.…”
Section: A Faults In Different Degreesmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4. We observe that the magnetic intensity value at point 1, 5,9,13, and 17, which lies in the center of the grounding mesh, is much higher than that at other points; whereas the magnetic intensity value at point 3, 7, 11, and 15, which lies right above the grounding conductor, is significantly smaller than that at other points when grounding grids have no fault. In situation 2, the magnetic intensity value at point 8, 9 and 10 which lies within the corrosion mesh has a maximal drop of about 5.81%, while that at other points has no significant change.…”
Section: A Faults In Different Degreesmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Instead, the equivalent resistivity reflects the ability of underground media (e.g., grid, soil) forming the eddy current and the impact of transient process of the receiver loop [13]. The corresponding equivalent depth does not exactly reflect the actual depth either.…”
Section: Influence Of Break Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature [10] pointed out that each coil can be equivalent to one node, and the node-to-node capacitance is calculated by a finite element model using the Maxwell 2-D electrostatic axisymmetric solver. The equivalent lumped distributed capacitance C between two terminal nodes can be calculated by calculating the parasitic capacitance of each turn and using Matlab software proper matrix operation to eliminate the intermediate nodes.…”
Section: Calculating Of the Coil Equivalent Circuit Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark: In the fault diagnosis of grounding grids, the calculated equivalent resistivity is not the actual resistivity of the ground. Instead, the equivalent resistivity reflects the ability of underground media (e.g., grid, soil) forming the eddy current and the impact of transient process of the receiver loop [21]. The actual resistivity of underground can be obtained by using the direct current method [25].…”
Section: Arbitrary Measuring Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TEM technique is effective in determining the electrical resistivity of the underground layers and has been widely used in shallow geological exploration [21]. A typical TEM system is a transmitter-receiver pair that records the secondary magnetic field for inversion imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%