2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient expression of inactive RB in mesenchymal stem cells impairs their adipogenic potential and is associated with hypermethylation of the PPARγ2 promoter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1, S2). All plasmids used in the analysis of DNA methylation of distal and proximal Oct4 enhancers (Baryshev et al 2018 ) and the proximal PPARg2 promoter (Baryshev et al 2022 ) were obtained by the DM miniprep method. We compared the presence of host genomic DNA in the plasmids obtained by DM, SM minipreps and commercial non-miniprep kits recommended for purification of high-quality plasmid DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1, S2). All plasmids used in the analysis of DNA methylation of distal and proximal Oct4 enhancers (Baryshev et al 2018 ) and the proximal PPARg2 promoter (Baryshev et al 2022 ) were obtained by the DM miniprep method. We compared the presence of host genomic DNA in the plasmids obtained by DM, SM minipreps and commercial non-miniprep kits recommended for purification of high-quality plasmid DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1, S2). All plasmids used in the analysis of DNA methylation of distal and proximal Oct4 enhancers (Baryshev et al, 2018) and the proximal PPARg2 promoter (Baryshev et al, 2020) were obtained by the DM miniprep method. We have compared the presence of host genomic DNA in the plasmids obtained both by DM, SM minipreps and commercial nonminiprep kits recommended for puri cation of high quality plasmid DNA.…”
Section: Plasmid Yield By Dm Miniprep Depends On Oscillation-driving Mixing Parameters and Exceeds That By Sm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploring the altered status of DNA methylation to use it as a disease-speci c biomarker, some researchers focus on CpG islands (CGIs) and do not attach importance to the methylation of several CpGs located in proximal promoters [6]. However, it has been shown that methylation of even a single CpG in proximity of transcription start site (TSS) of Pparg2, a major regulator of adipogenesis, can silence the gene and thus prevent its expression, thereby blocking the adipocyte differentiation pathway [7,8]. Given the general clinical utility of the PSA gene in PCa testing, methylation of the CpG and CCWGG (W = A/T) proximal promoter was studied in PSA-expressing or nonexpressing LNCaP and PC3 cancer cell lines, as well as in non-cancerous BPH1 and HPrEpiC cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%