2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient exergetic efficiency and moisture loss analysis of forced convection drying with and without electrohydrodynamic enhancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3, it follows that energy efficiency of EHD was almost independent of electrode configuration. This methodology of calculation of energy efficiency in EHD drying is used in most of repor ted research [14,16,19], and sometimes it is referred to as "exergy efficiency" [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3, it follows that energy efficiency of EHD was almost independent of electrode configuration. This methodology of calculation of energy efficiency in EHD drying is used in most of repor ted research [14,16,19], and sometimes it is referred to as "exergy efficiency" [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes an ionic air stream that disrupts the primary air flow and alters the boundary layer above the food product. This results is an intensification of convective heat transfer and mass transfer between the air and the drying product for low primary airflow velocities [5]- [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Bardy et al [5], the efficiency (quantified in terms of exergetic efficiency) and drying rate of FC verses EHD drying were compared for various wire-electrode configurations using methylcellulose gel as the test specimen. It was found that EHD drying could yield the same drying rates as FC drying with 80 -85% less airflow velocity, which resulted in a significant increase in exergetic efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations