The depression of glass transition temperature, annealing-induced phase separation, and morphology were
investigated in a binary solid solution of N,N‘-diphenyl-N,N‘-bis(3-methylphenyl)-[1,1‘-biphenyl]-4,4‘-diamine
(TPD) in bisphenol A polycarbonate (BPAPC) and cyclohexyl polycarbonate (PCZ) with three different
molecular weights. Differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, microscopy, and FTIR were used to
characterize these composites. Molecularly doped TPD in polymers significantly depressed the T
g of the host
polymers. Although it could be expected that the TPD would disperse well in a flexible polymer and cause
a substantial decrease in T
g, we find that the extent of depression is more pronounced with the rigid polymer.
FTIR studies indicate that a molecular level interaction exists between TPD and the polycarbonates, as shown
by the frequency shifts in the aromatic region. Upon annealing, the phase separation and crystallization of
TPD lead to a recovery of the T
g of the polymer, by 10−20 °C, depending on the temperature and time of
annealing. In the case of TPD/BPAPC composites, although the crystallinity of the phase-separated TPD was
found to be close to 30%, the extent of recovery of the T
g was small. This is attributed to the plasticizing
effect of the TPD crystals. A lower degree of crystallinity was observed in the case of TPD/PCZ, which is
due to the lower molecular flexibility of the PCZ relative to BPAPC as well as the difference between the T
g
of the polymer and the annealing temperature. The molecular weight and its dispersion has a significant
effect on the recovery of the T
g in the case of PCZ, as well as the crystallinity of the phase-separated TPD.