2008
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2007.135046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient elastography predicts fibrosis progression in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Abstract: TE accurately predicts fibrosis progression in LT patients with recurrent hepatitis C, suggesting that protocol LB might be avoided in patients with improved or stable TE values during follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
121
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
13
121
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…TE, a recently developed, simple and noninvasive technique to measure hepatic stiffness, has been shown to be a reliable tool to estimate the degree of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease, mainly in those with chronic HCV infection [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In b-thalassemia patients (especially those HCV infected) at higher risk of liver biopsy related complications as compared to other chronically HCV-infected patients, the availability of a noninvasive method to measure hepatic fibrosis is crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TE, a recently developed, simple and noninvasive technique to measure hepatic stiffness, has been shown to be a reliable tool to estimate the degree of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease, mainly in those with chronic HCV infection [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In b-thalassemia patients (especially those HCV infected) at higher risk of liver biopsy related complications as compared to other chronically HCV-infected patients, the availability of a noninvasive method to measure hepatic fibrosis is crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of the speed of propagation of the wave across the hepatic parenchyma provides an estimate of the liver elasticity, which is a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis [8][9][10]. In studies comparing the results of TE versus liver biopsy as the reference standard, TE showed a satisfactory accuracy in identifying patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) accompanied by significant fibrosis or cirrhosis and it has been shown to have a good interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) cannot yet confidently predict the presence of esophageal varices in clinical practice and thus avoid the need for upper GI endoscopic screening of cirrhotic patients [85]. TE could be also valuable for assessing the severity of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation, reducing the need for follow-up liver biopsies [78,[86][87][88][89][90]. It has been recently suggested that TE may perform better for significant fibrosis than serum (direct and indirect) biomarkers [91].…”
Section: Monitoring Of Disease Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, LSM has proven to be useful to assess histological progression after transplantation (13,14). However, to date, no study has evaluated the association between liver stiffness and clinical events, including graft and patient survival, in recurrent hepatitis C following LT. Only a score comprising three direct serum biomarkers proved helpful to predict the development of clinical decompensations and graft loss in this setting (15), though these markers have not been validated so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%