2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.61.r5070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient charge carrier distribution at UV-photoexcitedSiO2/Siinterfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface charging processes have previously also been investigated by electric field induced second harmonic generation (EFISH), [62][63][64][65][66][67] in which the sub-surface electric field is deduced based on modeling the field-enhancement of optical second harmonic generation signal as well as photoemission. [68] We find that the field strength E ∼ 1-5 V/nm, obtained in our study of the Si/SiO 2 interface, is very similar to what was found in EFISH studies under similar excitation conditions, [65,66] but because of a lower laser repetition rate is applied here (1 kHz in UEDV, compared to 80 MHz in EFISH), cyclic residual charge accumulation from deep trap states [69][70][71][72] is avoided, allowing the transient charging behavior to be resolved directly.…”
Section: Surface Photovoltagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface charging processes have previously also been investigated by electric field induced second harmonic generation (EFISH), [62][63][64][65][66][67] in which the sub-surface electric field is deduced based on modeling the field-enhancement of optical second harmonic generation signal as well as photoemission. [68] We find that the field strength E ∼ 1-5 V/nm, obtained in our study of the Si/SiO 2 interface, is very similar to what was found in EFISH studies under similar excitation conditions, [65,66] but because of a lower laser repetition rate is applied here (1 kHz in UEDV, compared to 80 MHz in EFISH), cyclic residual charge accumulation from deep trap states [69][70][71][72] is avoided, allowing the transient charging behavior to be resolved directly.…”
Section: Surface Photovoltagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] Photoemission utilizing UV, X-rays, and lasers has also been employed for probing very fast (<10 -9 s) charging dynamics. [7][8][9] Core-level X-ray photoemission, XPS, is especially attractive, since additional chemical information can also be derived from the line positions of the corresponding peaks. However, the measured line positions are severely altered by local potentials developed due to the uncompensated charges resulting from photoelectron emission, especially for poorly conducting samples or regions (layers or domains) within such samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional data gathering mode the sample is grounded, and the position as well as the intensity of the peaks are recorded in a static fashion [20]. Although several reports have appeared in the literature related to dynamical XPS measurements in the two extreme ends, very fast (nanoseconds to attoseconds) [21][22][23][24], and very slow (minutes to hours) [25][26][27] through various publications, the basic principles and techniques for implementing such measurements employing very simple modification to conventional instruments [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%