1939
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(39)90592-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient bundle branch block and other electrocardiographic changes in pulmonary embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1941
1941
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple clinical procedures such as history, physical ex amination and chest x-ray may help the physician to suspect this condition [25,26], ECG has been used with little success to diagnose pulmonary embolism [4,5,7,9]. Patterns as SiQyTy or RBBB, previously described as typical for pulmonary embo lism, do not occur frequently [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simple clinical procedures such as history, physical ex amination and chest x-ray may help the physician to suspect this condition [25,26], ECG has been used with little success to diagnose pulmonary embolism [4,5,7,9]. Patterns as SiQyTy or RBBB, previously described as typical for pulmonary embo lism, do not occur frequently [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to history, symp- toms, physical examination and chest xray, electrocardiography is a common procedure on which the suspicion of pul monary embolism may be raised. Never theless, since the original description of McGinn and White [4] in 1935, ECG pat terns suggestive of pulmonary embolism have never been controlled [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], The aim of this work was to assess the role of ECG in raising the suspicion of pulmonary embolism and in distinguish ing the patients who, subsequently, were shown to have pulmonary embolism from those in whom the suspicion was not con firmed. To this purpose, in a group of 374 consecutive patients with suspicion of pul monary embolism, we analyzed the ECG both at the time of diagnosis and during recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time intervals between the occurrence of the embolism and the taking of the electrocardiogram in our seven cases are as follows: Case 45, 1 hour; Cases 40 and 46, 12 hours; Cases 43 and 49, 24 hours; Case 42, 2 days; and Case 50, 22 days. Durant et al (1939) were of the opinion that right bundle-branch block changes were an early finding and a transient one, but Case 50 in our series showed right bundle-branch block to be present 22 days after the embolism.…”
Section: Durationmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The remaining two patients were followed only for 16 and 18 days and no changes in the T wave took place during this time. Durant et al (1939) published an account of three cases in which right bundle-branch block was seen to be present during the first hour or two after the embolism and disappeared after about 12 hours. Wood (1948) found transient right bundlebranch block patterns in three of his twenty cases.…”
Section: Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 ECG abnormalities, such as the S I Q III T III pattern, right bundle branch block, and anterior T wave inversion, have been observed to return to normal after treatment for PE. [8][9][10] Ferrari and colleagues 10 observed that anterior T wave inversion was present in 85% of cases of massive PE and 19% of cases of non-massive PE, and that its reversibility before the 60th day pointed to a good outcome. They also found that ECG findings of sinus tachycardia and pulmonary P wave as determined by amplitude of > 0.25 mV in lead II (both present in this case) each had 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value in assessing the severity of PE but had poor sensitivity and negative predictive value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%