2023
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1046300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient autoantibodies to danger signals

Abstract: The Danger Model predicts that there are some molecules that no immune system can ever be fully tolerant of, namely proteins that are only transiently expressed during times of stress, infection, or injury. Among these are the danger/alarm signals themselves. Accordingly, a fleeting autoantibody response to danger signals is expected during times when they are released. Depending on context, these autoantibodies may serve beneficial “housekeeping” functions by removing surplus danger signals from the circulati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it is important to remember the possibility that the production of aAbs can be limited in time and can stop when the triggering stimulus fails. For instance, while anti-IFN-I aAbs remained stable in patients with AIRE deficiency and thymic malignancies, anti-IFN-I aAbs with neutralizing activity peaked soon after COVID-19 onset and declined to undetectable levels during convalescence [ 187 ]. Therefore, depending on context, these aAbs may serve beneficial “housekeeping” functions through removing surplus danger signals from circulation or, conversely, induce disease emergence.…”
Section: Significance Of the Production Of Aabs Against Ifnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is important to remember the possibility that the production of aAbs can be limited in time and can stop when the triggering stimulus fails. For instance, while anti-IFN-I aAbs remained stable in patients with AIRE deficiency and thymic malignancies, anti-IFN-I aAbs with neutralizing activity peaked soon after COVID-19 onset and declined to undetectable levels during convalescence [ 187 ]. Therefore, depending on context, these aAbs may serve beneficial “housekeeping” functions through removing surplus danger signals from circulation or, conversely, induce disease emergence.…”
Section: Significance Of the Production Of Aabs Against Ifnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DC exist as a spectrum of phenotypes and immune actions between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cells at the population and single cell level (reviewed in ( 11 , 12 ) and Table 3 ). At one end of this spectrum, they are widely referred to as “mature” as a consequence of their response to entering inside, or being subjected to a building micro-environment of tissue “damage/danger” ( 74 82 ). Under such micro-environmental conditions, tissue-resident and/or migratory DC increase the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins loaded with peptides acquired from cells and proteins from their microenvironment, and upregulated the cell surface levels of co-stimulatory proteins like CD40, CD86, and a series of cell-cell adhesion molecules – some with signaling capacity into and inside from T-cells ( 83 86 ).…”
Section: What Are Tolerogenic Dc? the State Of The Current Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%