2012
DOI: 10.5194/hess-16-3689-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient analysis of fluctuations of electrical conductivity as tracer in the stream bed

Abstract: Abstract. Spatial patterns of water flux in the stream bed are controlled by the distribution of hydraulic conductivity, bedform-induced head gradients and the connectivity to the adjoining groundwater system. The water fluxes vary over time driven by short-term flood events or seasonal variations in stream flow and groundwater level. Variations of electrical conductivity (EC) are used as a natural tracer to detect transient travel times and flow velocities in an in-stream gravel bar. We present a method to es… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[], and Schmidt et al . [] also interpreted decreases in fluid EC in hyporheic pore waters during high surface flows as an increasing surface water influence, and subsequent increased fluid EC during low flows as a decreasing surface water influence and increasing groundwater contributions. Unlike Malcolm et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[], and Schmidt et al . [] also interpreted decreases in fluid EC in hyporheic pore waters during high surface flows as an increasing surface water influence, and subsequent increased fluid EC during low flows as a decreasing surface water influence and increasing groundwater contributions. Unlike Malcolm et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These models generally simplify the complex flowpaths and boundary conditions of natural systems (Suckow 2014). There has been a large effort to increase the mathematical rigor of the models that use temperature and EC as τ tracers in TSZs (Cirpka et al 2007;Vogt et al 2010Vogt et al , 2012Rau et al 2012;Schmidt et al 2012;Vieweg et al 2016), especially related to uncertainty analysis and dynamic boundary conditions (Rau et al 2015;Vandersteen et al 2015). This effort is due in part to the low cost of temperature sensors, but also to the complexity of the heat transport equation when used for hyporheic sediments with variable boundary conditions (one-to three-dimensional (1-3D) flow, variable upper boundary, variably saturated flow (Cuthbert and Mackay 2013;Rau et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They attributed these EC fluctuations to a combination of biological (photosynthesis), chemical (carbonate equilibrium and precipitation), and physical (groundwater exchange) processes. Elsewhere, diel EC variations have been observed in small streams and attributed to evaporative enrichment during daytime (Calles, 1982), or the result of groundwater discharge, since groundwater typically has higher EC values (Schmidt et al, 2012). However, potential explanations for diel cycles in the SPR will need to be studied further over longer time periods that cover seasonal and inter-annual hydroclimatic variability, in combination with additional data, before this aspect can be satisfactorily resolved.…”
Section: Diel Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%