2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient analysis of dam–reservoir interaction including the reservoir bottom effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is again in agreement with the earlier observation of Zangar [Zangar, 1952;Zangar and Haefeli, 1952] who suggested that the maximum hydrodynamic pressure for dams with an inclined upstream face occurs at a vertical distance from the base approximately equal to one third of the reservoir height. The validity of the adopted reservoir modeling approach with solid finite elements has already been extensively verified against available closed form solutions [Chopra, 1967a] and other numerical studies [Kucukarslan et al, 2005]. Therefore, since it is considered an appropriate approach to model hydrodynamic pressures, the numerically predicted hydrodynamic pressures are used herein as a benchmark against which the Zangar [1952] predictions are assessed.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is again in agreement with the earlier observation of Zangar [Zangar, 1952;Zangar and Haefeli, 1952] who suggested that the maximum hydrodynamic pressure for dams with an inclined upstream face occurs at a vertical distance from the base approximately equal to one third of the reservoir height. The validity of the adopted reservoir modeling approach with solid finite elements has already been extensively verified against available closed form solutions [Chopra, 1967a] and other numerical studies [Kucukarslan et al, 2005]. Therefore, since it is considered an appropriate approach to model hydrodynamic pressures, the numerically predicted hydrodynamic pressures are used herein as a benchmark against which the Zangar [1952] predictions are assessed.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods exist, including finite element (FE) [Demirel, 2015] and boundary element (BE) approaches or coupled BE-FE [Antes and Von-Estorff, 1987;Yazdchi et al, 1999]. The reservoir can be discretized using elastic "solid finite elements" [Wilson, 1975;Zienkiewicz et al, 1986;Wilson, 1995;Dakoulas and Gazetas, 2008;Pelecanos et al, 2013] in which the bulk modulus of the water is assigned to the elements with a very small shear modulus, or "fluid elements", following Eulerian [Kucukarslan et al, 2005;Gogoi and Maity, 2007;Fan and Li, 2008] or Lagrangian [Akkose et al, 2008;Bilici et al, 2009;Kartal and Bayraktar, 2013] or MPM [Kularathna and Soga, 2017a; …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) and (16) describe the complete finite-element discretized equations for the gravity dam-water-foundation rock interaction problem and can be written in an assembled form as [25,26]:…”
Section: The Coupled Fluid-structure Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the finite element theory equations governing the dam is as follows (Kucukarslan, 2003): In Equation (2) Equations 1 and 7 are the equations of fluid and dam respectively. When these two media are placed in the vicinity of each others, the interaction effects between them governed the behavior of the system as follows:…”
Section: Euler -Lagrange Formulation For Dynamic Interaction Of Dam-rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dam structure has crest width of 14.8m, bottom width 70m, width of dam at the level of initial notch 19.25m and the tallest of monoliths which is 103m. In order to determine the hydrodynamic pressure on the dam due to horizontal ground motion under the assumption of infinite reservoir, Sommerfeld truncation boundary condition (Kucukarslan, 2003) was applied at a distance L 3H 300m from the dam (L = reservoir width and H = Dam height) (Chopra, 1967).The depth of the reservoir is 91.75 m. Finite element model for the dam -reservoir system is given in figure 7. …”
Section: Analysis Of Koyna Dammentioning
confidence: 99%