2004
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2004.825469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient 3-D FEM Computation of Eddy-Current Losses in the Rotor of a Claw-Pole Alternator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the electric excitation brushless claw-pole alternator, the HEBCA has a higher air-gap flux density and power density. (2) The hybrid excitation brushless claw-pole alternator generates the same air gap flux density with a smaller excitation current than the electric excitation claw-pole alternator, thus reduces the excitation loss and improves the efficiency of the alternator. (3) The excitation winding is fixed on the excitation bracket, thus brushes and slip-ring is eliminated and the operation reliability is improved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the electric excitation brushless claw-pole alternator, the HEBCA has a higher air-gap flux density and power density. (2) The hybrid excitation brushless claw-pole alternator generates the same air gap flux density with a smaller excitation current than the electric excitation claw-pole alternator, thus reduces the excitation loss and improves the efficiency of the alternator. (3) The excitation winding is fixed on the excitation bracket, thus brushes and slip-ring is eliminated and the operation reliability is improved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the computation time, the FEA is performed on the domain covering two poles, as shown in (1) When the excitation current is 0A, the air gap of the electric excitation claw pole alternator is 0T, while the average magnetic density of the hybrid excitation claw pole alternator is 0.18T. (2) When the excitation current is positive, the air gap flux density of the HEBCA is more than the EECA's air gap flux density. With the excitation current increasing, the maximum value of average air gap flux density of HEBCA is 0.51T, while the maximum value of average air gap flux density of EECA is 0.41T.…”
Section: Fea-based Investigation Of Magnetic Field Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4]. The eddy current losses in the rotor are calculated with a transient-nonlinear solver where a number of attempts are made in order to validate the results when considering the simulation time, convergence speed and the accuracy of the results.…”
Section: A Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existing of brushes and commutator significantly restrict their further develop-ment [1][2][3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%