1990
DOI: 10.1017/s0016756800013819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transgressions and regressions: a model for the influence of tectonic subsidence, deposition and eustasy, with application to Quaternary and Carboniferous examples

Abstract: The position of a coastline in time and space is determined by (1) the vertical displacement and/or tilting of the depositional surface, (2) the rate of sediment accumulation or erosion across that surface, and (3) variation of sea-level. All three rates of change may vary through time. We present computer simulations of coastline movements that illustrate the interaction of the above variables, with (1) and (2) held at various defined levels whilst (3) is varied according to the late Quaternary glacio-eustati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(47 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the regional extent of early to mid-Holocene rSLR along most of the Brazilian coast, the variability in UMP can be directly related to the antecedent topography and the wave energy available for upland erosion. Each of these drivers is modifi ed by local and regional geologic, oceanographic, and climatic controls such as tectonics, shelf width, coastal confi guration, substrate type, slope, local subsidence, and climate changes (Curray, 1964;Collier et al, 1990;Wolinsky and Murray, 2009;Moore et al, 2010). Moreover, climatic conditions, oceanographic conditions, and sediment supply rates and directions all vary significantly along the Brazilian coast (Dominguez, 2009).…”
Section: Control Of Upland Migration Potential (Ump)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the regional extent of early to mid-Holocene rSLR along most of the Brazilian coast, the variability in UMP can be directly related to the antecedent topography and the wave energy available for upland erosion. Each of these drivers is modifi ed by local and regional geologic, oceanographic, and climatic controls such as tectonics, shelf width, coastal confi guration, substrate type, slope, local subsidence, and climate changes (Curray, 1964;Collier et al, 1990;Wolinsky and Murray, 2009;Moore et al, 2010). Moreover, climatic conditions, oceanographic conditions, and sediment supply rates and directions all vary significantly along the Brazilian coast (Dominguez, 2009).…”
Section: Control Of Upland Migration Potential (Ump)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-frequency fourth, fifth, or higher order shallowing-upward depositional cycles are the building blocks of lower-frequency (thirdorder) depositional sequences in carbonates (Goldhammer et al 1990;Read 1995). Climatic variations result from cyclic changes in the earth's orbital parameters such as Collier et al (1990) based on their computer simulations of coastline movement that illustrate the interaction of the tectonic subsidence, deposition and eustasy estimated that Carboniferous precession had periodicities of approximately 19.5 ky and 16.6 ky and obliquity had a period of 31.1 ky. The time interval represented by strata at the studied section is approximately 2 my by comparison with correlative cycles and horizon boundaries in the Donets Basin identified by Izart et al (2003).…”
Section: Sequence Stratigraphic Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sea-level variations brought about by glacio-eustatic orbital forcing (due to the Milankovitch effect) have previously been proposed as the major control on Late Carboniferous cycle periods (Heckel 1986;Veevers & Powell 1987;Leeder 1988;Collier et al 1990). The orbital parameters and the resulting variations in insolation can be resolved mathematically, and their potential effect on climate can be estimated using Berger's (1978) algorithms.…”
Section: Orbital Forcing Control Of Cycle Periodicities and Magnitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the confirmation of the Milankovitch effect from the Quaternary record (Hays et al 1976) several authors have supported the early hypothesis (Wanless & Shepard 1936) that Milankovitch driven glacio-eustacy caused Late Palaeozoic sedimentary cycles (Crowell 1978;Heckel 1986;Veevers & Powell 1987;Walkden 1987;Leeder 1988;Collier et al 1990). However, Algeo & Wilkinson (1988) pointed out that because of convergence in deposition rates in many sedimentary environments, mesoscale (1CL100m thick) sedimentary cycles will invariably give periodicities within the Milankovitch range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%