1998
DOI: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.15.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transgenic Plant Production from Embryogenic Callus of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Using Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The plasmids were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA101, and used to transform embryogenic calli induced from shoot meristems as described by Otani et al (1998) with some modification: Agrobacterium was co-cultured at 23 C and on the medium containing 3% (w/v) maltose and 1% (w/v) glucose instead of 3% (w/v) sucrose.…”
Section: Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plasmids were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA101, and used to transform embryogenic calli induced from shoot meristems as described by Otani et al (1998) with some modification: Agrobacterium was co-cultured at 23 C and on the medium containing 3% (w/v) maltose and 1% (w/v) glucose instead of 3% (w/v) sucrose.…”
Section: Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several reports on the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sweet potato have been published. However majority of the most efficient and robust Agrobacterium transformation systems succeed in transformation of marker genes such as gfp, gusA, nptII, bar [5,10,[34][35][36][37]. Therefore, genetic transformation of sweet potato remains cumbersome and labor-intensive due to the difficulty in plant regeneration of several recalcitrant cultivars, and the reproducibility of the used protocol [15,17,34,[36][37][38][39] .…”
Section: Biological Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3a, although there was no significant difference between 3 and 4 days of cocultivation for M. zumi callus, 4 days of co-cultivation caused overgrowth of A. tumefaciens which were difficult to completely eliminate by antibiotic and therefore were harmful to the callus. Prakash et al (1991) indicated that the co-cultivation period should be not less than 4 days, and Otani et al (1998) indicated that 2 days was suggested for co-cultivation period. Xing et al (2007) maintained that the difference in co-cultivation period was due to the different species and explants.…”
Section: Optimization Of Conditions For Transformation and Plant Regementioning
confidence: 99%