Abstract:Background:The aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AhRR) is known to repress aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling, but very little is known regarding the role of the AhRR in vivo.Objective:This study tested the role of AhRR in vivo in AhRR overexpressing mice on molecular and toxic end points mediated through a prototypical AhR ligand.Methods:We generated AhRR-transgenic mice (AhRR Tg) based on the genetic background of C57BL/6J wild type (wt) mice. We tested the effect of the prototypical AhR ligand 2,3… Show more
“…In
addition to BPA (404) (32) (433),
gene expression and secretion of inflammatory factors from adipocytes has been
reported to increase in response to TCDD (195) (235) (34) (292)
(203), PCB-77 (34) PCB-126 (203), and DEHP (62). Moreover, infiltration of macrophages into AT, a pathway associated with
obesity-induced insulin resistance, has been reported as a result of exposure to
DEHP (a phthalate) (62) HBCD (a BFR)
(431), and TCDD (415). …”
We examine the role of adipose tissue, typically considered an energy
storage site, as a potential site of toxicant accumulation. Although the
production of most persistent organic pollutants (POPs) was banned years ago,
these toxicants persist in the environment due to their resistance to
biodegradation and widespread distribution in various environmental forms (e.g.,
vapor, sediment, water). As a result, human exposure to these toxicants is
inevitable. Largely due to their lipophilicity, POPs bioaccumulate in adipose
tissue, resulting in greater body burdens of these environmental toxicants with
obesity. POPs of major concern include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and furans (PCDDs/PCDFs), and polybrominated
biphenyls and diphenyl ethers (PBBs/PBDEs), among other organic compounds. In
this review, we 1) highlight the physical characteristics of toxicants that
enable them to partition into and remain stored in adipose tissue, 2) discuss
the specific mechanisms of action by which these toxicants act to influence
adipocyte function, and 3) review associations between POP exposures and the
development of obesity and diabetes. An area of controversy relates to the
relative potential beneficial versus hazardous health effects of toxicant
sequestration in adipose tissue.
“…In
addition to BPA (404) (32) (433),
gene expression and secretion of inflammatory factors from adipocytes has been
reported to increase in response to TCDD (195) (235) (34) (292)
(203), PCB-77 (34) PCB-126 (203), and DEHP (62). Moreover, infiltration of macrophages into AT, a pathway associated with
obesity-induced insulin resistance, has been reported as a result of exposure to
DEHP (a phthalate) (62) HBCD (a BFR)
(431), and TCDD (415). …”
We examine the role of adipose tissue, typically considered an energy
storage site, as a potential site of toxicant accumulation. Although the
production of most persistent organic pollutants (POPs) was banned years ago,
these toxicants persist in the environment due to their resistance to
biodegradation and widespread distribution in various environmental forms (e.g.,
vapor, sediment, water). As a result, human exposure to these toxicants is
inevitable. Largely due to their lipophilicity, POPs bioaccumulate in adipose
tissue, resulting in greater body burdens of these environmental toxicants with
obesity. POPs of major concern include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and furans (PCDDs/PCDFs), and polybrominated
biphenyls and diphenyl ethers (PBBs/PBDEs), among other organic compounds. In
this review, we 1) highlight the physical characteristics of toxicants that
enable them to partition into and remain stored in adipose tissue, 2) discuss
the specific mechanisms of action by which these toxicants act to influence
adipocyte function, and 3) review associations between POP exposures and the
development of obesity and diabetes. An area of controversy relates to the
relative potential beneficial versus hazardous health effects of toxicant
sequestration in adipose tissue.
“…AHRR has been described as a negative tissue-specific regulator of mCYP1A1 expression [43, 44]. Its overexpression in transgenic mice suppresses the mCYP1A1 induction in lung, spleen, and adipose tissue [45]. Moreover, it has been suggested that rat CYP1A1 regulates its own expression because it catalyzes the removal of AHR agonists and thus decreases the activation of this pathway [46, 47].…”
Human cytochrome P450 1A1 (hCYP1A1) has been an object of study due to its role in precarcinogen metabolism; for this reason it is relevant to know more in depth the mechanisms that rule out its expression and activity, which make this enzyme a target for the development of novel chemiopreventive agents. The aim of this work is to review the origin, regulation, and structural and functional characteristics of CYP1A1 letting us understand its role in the bioactivation of precarcinogen and the consequences of its modulation in other physiological processes, as well as guide us in the study of this important protein.
“…On the other hand, CYP1A1 induction by AhR activation is not always enhanced in AhRR KO mice [11], and thus, the function of AhRR has remained a subject of dispute. Interestingly, in AhRR transgenic mice, which we produced previously, the basal expression of CYP1A1 in the kidney was increased compared to wild-type mice [14], suggesting that AhRR may have a positive regulatory function in murine kidneys. AhRR has been reported not to suppress CYP1A1 expression in human skin fibroblasts [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equal amounts of protein were loaded, separated via SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The blocked membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-AhRR [14], anti-C/EBPα (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-C/EBPβ (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-PPARγ (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-α-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich). Then, the membrane was incubated in solutions with peroxide-conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and was visualized using peroxide substrates (SuperSignal West Dura, Thermo Fisher Scientific).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two control siRNAs (12935–300 and 12935–200, Invitrogen) were used as the control. The cloning and generation of the mouse AhRR expression vector (pAhRR) has been described recently [14]. A mixture of 3 AhRR siRNAs or 2 control siRNAs, pAhRR and the empty vector were transfected into 3T3-L1 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) as recommended by the manufacturer.…”
The aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AhRR) negatively regulates aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling via its inhibitory transactivation. AhR is well known to suppress adipocyte differentiation, but the function of AhRR during adipogenesis is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of AhRR in adipocyte differentiation using 3T3-L1 cells. During the early phase of differentiation, AhRR expression was transiently induced, but throughout the entire differentiation process, low levels of AhR expression were maintained. AhRR knockdown significantly increased not only glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) activity but also lipid accumulation inside the cells. AhRR overexpression clearly reduced GPDH activity and lipid accumulation, indicating that AhRR upregulation during the early stage of adipogenesis suppresses adipocyte differentiation. Since AhRR knockdown increases the expression and activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ(PPARγ), AhRR negatively regulates PPARγ during adipogenesis. In summary, similar to AhR, AhRR acts as an inhibitor of adipocyte differentiation. In addition to controlling the negative feedback loop of AhR, AhRR might be involved in other functions, especially in adipocyte differentiation processes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.