2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transgenic inhibition of Nogo-66 receptor function allows axonal sprouting and improved locomotion after spinal injury

Abstract: Axon growth after spinal injury is thought to be limited in part by myelin-derived proteins that act via the Nogo-66 Receptor (NgR). To test this hypothesis, we sought to study recovery from spinal cord injury (SCI) after inhibiting NgR transgenically with a soluble function-blocking NgR fragment. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (gfap) gene regulatory elements were used to generate mice that secrete NgR(310)ecto from astrocytes. After mid-thoracic dorsal over-hemisection injury, gfap∷ngr(310)ecto mice exhibit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
71
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interfering with the Nogo-NgR axis by antagonizing the inhibitory effects of NogoA pharmacologically using the monoclonal antibody IN-1 [25][26][27][28][29] or in nogo-a knockout mice [30][31][32] has shown significant long-distance growth of damaged CST axons after dorsal hemisection with concomitant restoration of locomotor function. Similar results were observed with therapies that antagonized the activation of NgR1, using either the Nogo receptor antagonist peptide NEP1-40 or a soluble version of NgR1 called NgR(310)ecto-Fc [33][34][35][36][37]. These studies directly correlate the growth of damaged CST axons into the caudal spinal cord with recovery of locomotion.…”
Section: Myelin-associated Inhibitors and Axonal Growthsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Interfering with the Nogo-NgR axis by antagonizing the inhibitory effects of NogoA pharmacologically using the monoclonal antibody IN-1 [25][26][27][28][29] or in nogo-a knockout mice [30][31][32] has shown significant long-distance growth of damaged CST axons after dorsal hemisection with concomitant restoration of locomotor function. Similar results were observed with therapies that antagonized the activation of NgR1, using either the Nogo receptor antagonist peptide NEP1-40 or a soluble version of NgR1 called NgR(310)ecto-Fc [33][34][35][36][37]. These studies directly correlate the growth of damaged CST axons into the caudal spinal cord with recovery of locomotion.…”
Section: Myelin-associated Inhibitors and Axonal Growthsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similar results were obtained by transgenic expression of the same NgR1 ectodomain in mice (Li et al, 2005). The pattern of axonal sprouting in these two studies appears to differ from that of the study with intrathecal administration of NEP1-40 in rats where ectopic CST fibers in the white matter above and below injury are the hallmark.…”
Section: Ngr1supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Intrathecal delivery of an NgR1 ectodomain that acts as an NgR1 antagonist by competing with endogenous NgR1 in binding the inhibitory ligands (Nogo, MAG and OMgp) leads to enhanced CST and serotonergic fiber regeneration and sprouting, and improved functional recovery in rats Li et al, 2005). Similar results were obtained by transgenic expression of the same NgR1 ectodomain in mice (Li et al, 2005).…”
Section: Ngr1mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…MAG, nogo, and oligodendrocyte myelin glycoprotein signal through a receptor complex consisting of the nogo receptor, p75, and LINGO (Bandtlow and Dechant, 2004). Genetic deletion of the nogo receptor does not foster regeneration, but the transgenic expression of a soluble receptor antagonist does (Li et al, 2005;Zheng et al, 2005). Why genetic targeting of known growthinhibitory molecules often fails but pharmacological targeting succeeds is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%