2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
16

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
90
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, three types of fullthickness suture devices are under evaluation for perforation closure of stomach and colon: two through-theendoscope devices such as the endoscopic suturing kit (Tfasteners with a locking cinch) and the gProx (USGI Medical, San Clemente, CA, USA), and one over-theendoscope device, the Eagle Claw Suturing Device (Apollo Group and the Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) [11]. The endoscopic suturing kit has been used successfully in different gastrointestinal procedures (perforations after endoluminal gastric or colon resections, transgastric gastrojejunostomy and pyloroplasty, closure of perforated gastric ulcer) both in animals and humans [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Because this method uses equipment that works through a 2.8-mm channel of a standard gastroscope, we hypothesized that we could apply it through a 7F working channel of a cystoscope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, three types of fullthickness suture devices are under evaluation for perforation closure of stomach and colon: two through-theendoscope devices such as the endoscopic suturing kit (Tfasteners with a locking cinch) and the gProx (USGI Medical, San Clemente, CA, USA), and one over-theendoscope device, the Eagle Claw Suturing Device (Apollo Group and the Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) [11]. The endoscopic suturing kit has been used successfully in different gastrointestinal procedures (perforations after endoluminal gastric or colon resections, transgastric gastrojejunostomy and pyloroplasty, closure of perforated gastric ulcer) both in animals and humans [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Because this method uses equipment that works through a 2.8-mm channel of a standard gastroscope, we hypothesized that we could apply it through a 7F working channel of a cystoscope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In fact, there are several theoretical advantages to NOTES. 1) There are no abdominal incisions and, therefore, abdominal wound infections and incisional hernias are avoided, possibly resulting in less pain and certainly in a better cosmetic effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have since used the transgastric port for intraperitoneal abdominal procedures, such as fallopian tube ligation, cholecystectomy, gastrojejunostomy, lymphadenectomy, oophorectomy, partial hysterectomy, splenectomy, appendectomy, and diaphragmatic pacing [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]23]. Following the initial enthusiasm, however, abdominal procedures through isolated transgastric routes raised limitations that jeopardized application in humans.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These developments marked a new era in minimally invasive abdominal surgery, compelling novel, previously audacious goals, such as avoidance of incisions and pain. With the visceral wall no longer a barrier to endoscopic intervention, various authors described novel, complex abdominal procedures [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In 2006, such reports motivated researchers in this emerging field to organize the Natural Orifice Surgery Consortium for Assessment and Research (NOSCAR), a joint initiative supported by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (AGES) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%