Transforming the construction sector: an institutional complexity perspective

Abstract

Purpose Government initiatives to improve construction have increasingly become more focused on introducing a repertoire of technologies to transform the sector. In the literature on construction industry transformation through policy-backed initiatives, how firms will respond to the demands to adopt and use innovative technologies and approaches is taken for granted, and there is scarcely any attention given to the institutional implications of transformation agenda. The purpose of this paper is to discuss these gaps and offer directions for future research. Design/methodology/approach Following a synthesis of literature on the UK’s industry transformation agenda, the authors use the concepts of institutional logics, arrangements, complexity and strategic responses to suggest seven research questions that are at the nexus of policy-backed transformation and institutional theory. Findings In this paper, the authors argue that increasing demands for the adoption and use of digital technologies, platforms, manufacturing approaches and other “industry-4.0”-related technologies will reconfigure existing logics and arrangements in the construction industry, creating a problem of institutional complexity for general contracting firms in particular. Originality/value The questions are relevant for our understanding of the nature of institutional complexities, change, strategic firm responses, field-level dynamics and implications for the construction industry in relation to the transformation agenda. This paper is positioned to spur future research towards exploring the consequences of industry transformation through the lens of institutional theory.

BIM and Digital Twin for Developing Convergence Technologies as Future of Digital Construction

“…The construction industry itself is notoriously conservative in that it tends to regard new technologies with circumspection and is not necessarily given to passive conformism when faced with unpalatable adjustments to public policy settings announced by the government [41]. Nevertheless, a reckoning on tackling intensifying economic and social headwinds is fast approaching, and radical government intervention in response to climate change and the like is inevitable.…”

Impacts of institutional isomorphism on the adoption of social procurement in the Chinese construction industry

“…2.2 Institutional perspectives on social procurement adoption Contrary to the classic view which emphasizes the importance of individuals, rational actors and their personal preferences and interests in organizations (LePage, 2014), the focus of institutional theory is on the importance of the external environment in motivating organizations to change their structure and conduct to obtain social legitimacy (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983). The key premise is that organizational actors continually strive to achieve their goals within the confines of institutional restrictions (Greenwood et al, 2014;Oti-Sarpong et al, 2021). Institutional forces, such as cultural scripts and conventions, shape the patterns of organizational action more than instrumental calculations (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983;Meyer and Rowan, 1977b).…”

Relational contracting in Nordic construction – a comparative longitudinal account of institutional field developments

“…Moreover, digitalization and efforts to tackle pertinent social and environmental goals, not least climate change, has been linked to an increased use of more collaborative and integrated delivery models (Whyte, 2019; Kadefors et al. , 2021), even though this change has not taken place as rapidly as has been expected (Oti-Sarpong et al. , 2021).…”