“…I belong here" (2015,5). In common with many academic developers globally we have worked hard to encourage academics to be critically reflexive practitioners (Quinn and Vorster 2004) and to question traditional pedagogies and ways of assessing. We have had a measure of success in terms of promoting ideas related to what we consider to be "good" teaching, such as getting to know who your students are, catering for the legitimate learning needs of the students in front of you and not the mythically well-prepared students you would like, engaging with knowledge students bring into the course, using pedagogies that give students opportunities to engage actively in learning and to link their existing knowledge to new knowledge, inducting them into the literacies and ways of "being" of disciplines, using reliable, valid and fair methods to assess their students, and so on.…”