2014
DOI: 10.2196/med20.3128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming Patient Experience: Health Web Science Meets Medicine 2.0

Abstract: Until recently, the Western biomedical paradigm has been effective in delivering health care, however this model is not positioned to tackle complex societal challenges or solve the current problems facing health care and delivery. The future of medicine requires a shift to a patient-centric model and in so doing the Internet has a significant role to play. The disciplines of Health Web Science and Medicine 2.0 are pivotal to this approach. This viewpoint paper argues that these disciplines, together with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, DHIs may also need to combine the health and social care needs of individuals, as these are often closely intertwined, and some health systems are now moving towards integrating health and social care services [ 80 , 81 ]. Research in this space is exploring personalising technology through co-design and other participatory methods to improve usability as patients and the public are often excluded from this process and their input will be vital if DHIs are to be successful [ 82 , 83 ]. Furthermore, digital health readiness assessments are under development to see if an individual has the capacity for a DHI, what form this should take, and what engagement and enrolment strategies suit them [ 84 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, DHIs may also need to combine the health and social care needs of individuals, as these are often closely intertwined, and some health systems are now moving towards integrating health and social care services [ 80 , 81 ]. Research in this space is exploring personalising technology through co-design and other participatory methods to improve usability as patients and the public are often excluded from this process and their input will be vital if DHIs are to be successful [ 82 , 83 ]. Furthermore, digital health readiness assessments are under development to see if an individual has the capacity for a DHI, what form this should take, and what engagement and enrolment strategies suit them [ 84 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is true when the digital version is a near copy of the paper-based questionnaire in terms of content and layout. But in an era in which the use of plain language and “inclusive design” or “electronic health for all” [ 45 , 46 ] is being advocated increasingly [ 47 , 48 ], copying the content and layout of the original into the digital version may not be enough.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cocreation is a process to plan and define public services specifically aimed at reducing the mismatch between beneficiary needs and provided services. Its application in health services and prevention has been recommended [ 17 , 18 ], in particular when IT tools are proposed [ 19 - 22 ]. There are published case studies on the development of apps and other eHealth tools [ 19 , 23 - 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%