Transforming Mental Health Delivery Through Behavioral Economics and Implementation Science: Protocol for Three Exploratory Projects

Abstract

Background Efficacious psychiatric treatments are not consistently deployed in community practice, and clinical outcomes are attenuated compared with those achieved in clinical trials. A major focus for mental health services research is to develop effective and cost-effective strategies that increase the use of evidence-based assessment, prevention, and treatment approaches in community settings. Objective The goal of this program of research is to apply insights from behavioral economics and participatory design to advance the science and practice of implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) for individuals with psychiatric disorders across the life span. Methods Project 1 (Assisting Depressed Adults in Primary care Treatment [ADAPT]) is patient-focused and leverages decision-making heuristics to compare ways to incentivize adherence to antidepressant medications in the first 6 weeks of treatment among adults newly diagnosed with depression. Project 2 (App for Strengthening Services In Specialized Therapeutic Support [ASSISTS]) is provider-focused and utilizes normative pressure and social status to increase data collection among community mental health workers treating children with autism. Project 3 (Motivating Outpatient Therapists to Implement: Valuing a Team Effort [MOTIVATE]) explores how participatory design can be used to design organizational-level implementation strategies to increase clinician use of EBPs. The projects are supported by a Methods Core that provides expertise in implementation science, behavioral economics, participatory design, measurement, and associated statistical approaches. Results Enrollment for project ADAPT started in 2018; results are expected in 2020. Enrollment for project ASSISTS will begin in 2019; results are expected in 2021. Enrollment for project MOTIVATE started in 2018; results are expected in 2019. Data collection had begun for ADAPT and MOTIVATE when this protocol was submitted. Conclusions This research will advance the science of implementation through efforts to improve implementation strategy design, measurement, and statistical methods. First, we will test and refine approaches to collaboratively design implementation strategies with stakeholders (eg, discrete choice experiments and innovation tournaments). Second, we will refine the measurement of mechanisms related to heuristics used in decision making. Third, we will develop new ways to test mechanisms in multilevel implementation trials. This trifecta, coupled with findings from our 3 exploratory projects, will lead to improvements in our knowledge of what causes successful implementation, what variables moderate and mediate the effects of those causal factors, and how best to leverage this knowledge to increase the quality of care for people with psychiatric disorders. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03441399; https://www.clinicaltrials...

Smartphone apps for depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of techniques to increase engagement

“…PSD is well-established as an approach to development of new technologies and therefore may be more naturally incorporated into app development 7 , 8 . Behavioral economics has traditionally focused on economic decision-making 51 , then was applied to behavioral health 52 but has only more recently been used in the context of mental health interventions 53 . The results of our meta-analysis suggest that increasing the number of engagement techniques may be beneficial, and so it is likely that designers may need to draw from a range of engagement approaches to maximize the impact of app-based interventions.…”

Understanding the value of adhering to or adapting evidence-based interventions: a study protocol of a discrete choice experiment

“…It has been suggested that discrete choice experiments can be used as a stakeholder engagement strategy to identify attributes of EBIs and implementation strategies that can make the adoption of an EBI more attractive [ 64 – 66 ]. For example, it can be used to select and tailor implementation strategies to the needs of providers [ 67 ] or to barriers and facilitators [ 58 ] and to evaluate the appropriateness of these strategies [ 68 ]. Its advantages over traditional surveys include a more granular understanding of people’s decisions based on how they value options [ 67 ] and a better reflection of the trade-offs often involved in decisions related to implementation [ 58 ].…”

Estimating Downstream Budget Impacts in Implementation Research

“…10 There is a growing list of completed and planned studies in this area for interested readers. [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] Cost-effectiveness analyses have common approaches for presenting results. 58 There is growing literature on how to best present information on the budget impact for implementation science.…”