Transforming higher education in Bolivia by linking two contra-hegemonic movements: agroecology and the Decolonial turn

By deploying an intersectional feminist political ecology analysis, this paper explores small-scale farmers’ (SSFs’) experiences and responses to agricultural drought in the uMkhanyakude District Municipality, South Africa. A mixed methods approach was employed, incorporating a household questionnaire survey, and analysed using Microsoft Excel complemented by qualitative observations and document review, both of which underwent reflexive thematic analysis. The impacts of drought were particularly pronounced in the district, affecting agricultural productivity through reduced crop growth, extensive crop failures and increased livestock mortality. In addition, the study’s findings reveal how structural aspects of gender, shaped by social and cultural norms and institutions, can exacerbate gendered experiences of drought. SSFs actively leveraged the indigenous knowledge system (IKS) for adaptation, challenging dominant Eurocentric approaches. The efficacy of IKS in agriculture and its role in enhancing SSFs’ resilience to drought underscores its indispensability in policy and adaptation programmes. Furthermore, the study highlights potential ways to address and mitigate disparities among SSFs by avoiding simplistic and apolitical adaptation measures. Instead, it advocates for nuanced and contextually appropriate adaptation measures to ensure effective and equitable adaptation.

show abstract

From soil to tierrita: Contrasts between Mexican soil regulation and the perspectives, values, and practices of indigenous communities

Hensler,

Benítez,

Bracamontes Nájera

et al. 2024

Elem Sci Anth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soils, the basis of agroecosystems, have been generated and continuously modified not only by the interaction of physical, chemical, and biological factors but also by human activities, driven by local values and knowledge. The way different peoples relate to soil thus reflects diverse ways of knowing and being, and has a major effect on food and agroecosystems. However, the policies, regulations, and programs around fundamental components of the environment have been mostly developed from a monocultural hegemonic perspective, dominated by productivist and utilitarian values, with effects particularly in pluricultural countries like Mexico. To continue living their culture, worldviews, and management practices, the human rights of indigenous, peasant, and rural communities must be guaranteed and the legal framework modified. Moreover, these communities could lead the development of the integrative, dynamic, and relational views around agroecosystems that are urgently needed. Our pluricultural and transdisciplinary team thus aimed to contribute to the understanding of worldviews, practices, and governance structures of some indigenous communities in relation to soils. We performed 23 interviews in 8 communities to which some of our team members belong (Nahua communities in Veracruz, Masewalmeh communities in the state of Puebla, and a Zapotec community in the state of Oaxaca). We also reviewed the current regulations and major policies involving soils in Mexico and identified the main contrasts with the aspects we explored during the interviews. Our work describes diverse conceptions and ways of relating with la tierrita (tlaltikpaknansi—Mother Earth—and gidlio’ vaan—living territory), rather than soils, and shows how these contrast with or are even neglected by current regulations in Mexico. From this analysis, we propose some potential routes to build true pluricultural frameworks that are needed to guarantee indigenous and peasant rights, as well as to conserve soils and agroecosystems in more just, diverse and sustainable management schemes. Finally, we reflect on our experience working as a pluricultural team essaying research from a decolonial perspective in Agroecology. Please refer to Supplementary Materials, Full text Spanish version of this article, for a full text Spanish version of this article.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Transforming higher education in Bolivia by linking two contra-hegemonic movements: agroecology and the Decolonial turn

Cited by 3 publications

References 37 publications

Academic network-building for agroecology and sustainable agri-food systems in Southeast Asia: critical reflections on a regional initiative

Academic network-building for agroecology and sustainable agri-food systems in Southeast Asia: critical reflections on a regional initiative

Indigenous Knowledge System and Agricultural Drought Adaptation in the uMkhanyakude District Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal

From soil to tierrita: Contrasts between Mexican soil regulation and the perspectives, values, and practices of indigenous communities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About