2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5140085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming high-dimensional potential energy surfaces into a canonical polyadic decomposition using Monte Carlo methods

Abstract: A Monte Carlo method is proposed for transforming high-dimensional potential energy surfaces evaluated on discrete grid points into a sum-of-products form, more precisely into a Canonical Polyadic Decomposition form. To this end, a modified existing ansatz based on the alternating least squares method is used, in which numerically exact integrals are replaced with Monte Carlo integrals. This largely reduces the numerical cost by avoiding the evaluation of the potential on all grid points and allows the treatme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The kinetic energy operators are in the sum-of-products form, while potential energy operators must be expanded in the product form representation. Within the MCTDH code, 55 the POTFIT approach 62 is the default procedure to transform low-dimensional PESs to the product form, while for treating systems of larger dimensionality, alternatives, such as the n -mode representation, 63 the multigrid POTFIT, 64 Monte Carlo POTFIT (MCPOTFIT), 65 or those reported more recently, such as the Monte Carlo canonical polyadic decomposition (MCCPD) 66 and the rectangular collocation MCTDH (RC-MCTDH) 67 methods are used.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetic energy operators are in the sum-of-products form, while potential energy operators must be expanded in the product form representation. Within the MCTDH code, 55 the POTFIT approach 62 is the default procedure to transform low-dimensional PESs to the product form, while for treating systems of larger dimensionality, alternatives, such as the n -mode representation, 63 the multigrid POTFIT, 64 Monte Carlo POTFIT (MCPOTFIT), 65 or those reported more recently, such as the Monte Carlo canonical polyadic decomposition (MCCPD) 66 and the rectangular collocation MCTDH (RC-MCTDH) 67 methods are used.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schröder has recently introduced new ideas for making CP PESs. 238 An important advantage of EXPNN is that its memory cost is low. It can be used for molecular systems for which a tensor product grid would be so large that the potential could not be stored on the grid.…”
Section: Sop Nnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the Hamiltonian does not have the required form it can, at the cost of some extra calculations, be replaced by an operator that is approximately equal to the original Hamiltonian, but does have the required form. [44][45][46][47][48] For many molecules with more than five atoms, the best available PES is a SOP. 49 a variational calculation, it requires a lot of computer time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%