2015
DOI: 10.1111/1745-5871.12136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming cross‐cultural water research through trust, participation and place

Abstract: Indigenous voices in government-led natural resource management planning processes are often marginalised, misinterpreted, or excluded. Third parties, including government-employed geographers, can act as knowledge brokers in defining Indigenous values and interests so they might be included in government planning processes. This paper reviews and assesses a research partnership that evolved to document the complex and diverse ecological and hydrological values held by Ngan'gi speakers about the Daly River and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Australian research has made important contributions to this literature, highlighting the differences between indigenous and settler Australian water relations (Gibbs, 2006;Jackson, 2006;Rose, 2004;Toussaint, Sullivan & Yu, 2005;Weir, 2009;Woodward & McTaggart, 2016). Broadly, indigenous understandings of water are relational, based on 'an ontology of interconnection, reciprocity, and responsibility, in which landscape is living and life giving, inseparable from human existence' (Gibbs, 2010, p.365; see also Bawaka et al, 2013).…”
Section: Relational Perspectives On Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australian research has made important contributions to this literature, highlighting the differences between indigenous and settler Australian water relations (Gibbs, 2006;Jackson, 2006;Rose, 2004;Toussaint, Sullivan & Yu, 2005;Weir, 2009;Woodward & McTaggart, 2016). Broadly, indigenous understandings of water are relational, based on 'an ontology of interconnection, reciprocity, and responsibility, in which landscape is living and life giving, inseparable from human existence' (Gibbs, 2010, p.365; see also Bawaka et al, 2013).…”
Section: Relational Perspectives On Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participation was voluntary, and participants could withdraw from the project and any project activities at any time. This project process recognised the importance of building trust, relationships, and placebased learning (Woodward & McTaggart, 2016). The project facilitated Indigenous leadership by providing space for Traditional Owners within the planning process to address each group's key concerns about a changing climate related to the natural resources sector; develop some strategies to address these for inclusion in the adaptation plan; and identify the conditions that affect their adaptation responses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed methods by which the co-authors and senior Aboriginal knowledge-holders subsequently partnered to document and compile local seasonal calendars of aquatic resource use, are described elsewhere (13,32). Participatory research methods were adopted, and due to the relatively long time frame of research engagement (over three years) and healthy project resourcing, the research partnerships were able to evolve slowly as trust between partners built, responding to the interests and concerns of all participants involved (13).…”
Section: Methods: Co-developing the Seasonal Calendarmentioning
confidence: 99%