2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformer-based unsupervised contrastive learning for histopathological image classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed that their histopathology-specific model outperformed a general-purpose contrastive learning self-supervised model (i.e., MoCo [ 58 ]) on three datasets—tumor metastasis detection, tissue type classification, and tumor cellularity quantification—under annotation-limited settings. Lastly, Wang et al developed a self-supervised method combined with self-attention to learn the patch-level embeddings [ 62 , 63 ], and then performed slide-level image retrieval based on said embeddings [ 64 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that their histopathology-specific model outperformed a general-purpose contrastive learning self-supervised model (i.e., MoCo [ 58 ]) on three datasets—tumor metastasis detection, tissue type classification, and tumor cellularity quantification—under annotation-limited settings. Lastly, Wang et al developed a self-supervised method combined with self-attention to learn the patch-level embeddings [ 62 , 63 ], and then performed slide-level image retrieval based on said embeddings [ 64 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, various quality factors affect our performance, which include inconsistent lighting conditions or stain quality, stain differences and generalizing across sources [ 70 , 71 ]. State-of-the-art approaches have ushered in techniques for much more complicated classification tasks, including Gleason scoring (GS) or ISUP Gleason grading of prostate pathology [ 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ]. Classifying indolent from cancer grade based on H&E pathology with multiple glands is empirically a difficult problem—there is a subtle distinction between any neighboring patterns with a fuzzy discrimination boundary between the pattern scoring levels [ 8 , 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer algorithms have been in use since 1993 for image analysis for cancer grading, diagnosis and prognostic predictions [18]. Recently, deep learning based algorithms have dramatically improved the results of image analysis of pathological images [19][20][21]. Many DL based model have been developed to use for histopathological image analysis in lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%