2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.822810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformer-Based High-Frequency Oscillation Signal Detection on Magnetoencephalography From Epileptic Patients

Abstract: High-frequency oscillations (HFOs), observed within 80–500 Hz of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data, are putative biomarkers to localize epileptogenic zones that are critical for the success of surgical epilepsy treatment. It is crucial to accurately detect HFOs for improving the surgical outcome of patients with epilepsy. However, in clinical practices, detecting HFOs in MEG signals mainly depends on visual inspection by clinicians, which is very time-consuming, labor-intensive, subjective, and error-prone. To… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of pre-selecting potential pathological HFO features, we implemented a data-driven, self-supervised strategy using VAE to define pathological HFOs. In the field of HFOs, prior studies have explored various types of neural networks, including convolutional neuronal networks, 39,40 long short-term memory, 41,42 , and transformer 43 , to classify HFOs into pathological and physiological based on human-annotated labels. This reliance limits scalability on large datasets and is constrained by the subjectivity inherent in expert labeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of pre-selecting potential pathological HFO features, we implemented a data-driven, self-supervised strategy using VAE to define pathological HFOs. In the field of HFOs, prior studies have explored various types of neural networks, including convolutional neuronal networks, 39,40 long short-term memory, 41,42 , and transformer 43 , to classify HFOs into pathological and physiological based on human-annotated labels. This reliance limits scalability on large datasets and is constrained by the subjectivity inherent in expert labeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al applied MEGNet, an improved CapsuleNet model, to classify MEG, and achieved the result of 95% accuracy, 94% recall, 94% F1-score and 94% accuracy ( Liu et al, 2020 ). Guo et al developed a Transformer-based model for classifying HFO (TransHFO), which combined the advantages of virtual sample generation and multi-head attention mechanism to achieve classification results with 96.15% accuracy, 100% precision, 92.86% sensitivity, and 100% specificity ( Guo et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al [165] improved epilepsy detection using a Transformer model called Transformers for seizure detection, which achieved an AUROC of 92.10%. Guo et al [166] introduced TransHFO for detecting high-frequency oscillations in MEG data, achieving an accuracy of 95.80% and an F1-score of 95.93%. For psychiatric disorders, Qayyum et al [19] proposed a multimodal approach to diagnose mild depression by integrating audio spectrograms with brain signals.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nogales et al [161] -Private EEG PD 86.00% ACC BERT models Ke et al [162] MFCvT CHB-MIT [163] EEG Epilepsy 96.02% sensitivity Mutil-view gated inputs and Fourier transform 97.94% specificity Chen et al [164] -Kaggle EEG Epilepsy 82.00% sensitivity Integrating CNN and Transformer 74.60% AUROC Ma et al [165] TSD TUH EEG Epilepsy 92.10% AUROC Short-time Fourier transform Guo et al [166] TransHFO Private MEG HFO 95.80% ACC Presurgical diagnosis 95.93% F1 Qayyum et al [19] -MODMA [167] EEG Depression 97.20% precision End-to-end multimodal depression diagnosis 97.30% recall 97.30% F1 D'Costa et al [168] MS-BERT Private Text MS Testing: 88.00% Macro-F1 A pre-trained BERT specifically for MS Teferra et al [20] -Private Text Anxiety 64.00% AUROC Transformer improved anxiety prediction Huang et al [169] PABLO Private Text NAT Testing: 84.40% AUROC Patients prediction and risk factor identification Validation: 84.90% AUROC Deng et al [170] ST-Transformer ABIDE I [171] fMRI ASD 71.00% ACC Linear spatial-temporal multi-headed attention ABIDE II [171] 70.60% ACC Li et al [91] -ABIDE [148] fMRI ASD 74.18% ACC Functional connection for positional decoding Li et al [18] -Olejarczyk et al [172] EEG Paranoid SCZ Subject-independent: classify EEG data across different categories. They achieved accuracies of 91.30% and 84.26% on the BCICIV 2a [177] and BCICIV 2b [177] datasets, respectively, demonstrating the effective utilization of time and space features.…”
Section: Neural Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation