The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1971
DOI: 10.1121/1.1912375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics

Abstract: During the past decade a number of variations in the simple up-down procedure have been used in psychoacoustic testing. A broad class of these methods is described with due emphasis on the related problems of parameter estimation and the efficient placing of observations. The advantages of up-down methods are many, including simplicity, high efficiency, robustness, small-sample reliability, and relative freedom from restrictive assumptions. Several applications of these procedures in psychoacoustics are descri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
3,312
1
30

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,076 publications
(3,413 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
3,312
1
30
Order By: Relevance
“…A "2-down-1-up" rule was implemented, i.e., after two correct responses in a row, the stimulus level was decreased, and after one incorrect response, the level was increased. This procedure converges on the stimulus level that yields correct responses with a probability of 0.707 (Levitt 1971;Zwislocki and Relkin 2001). The starting level of the stimulus was always clearly above the expected threshold.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A "2-down-1-up" rule was implemented, i.e., after two correct responses in a row, the stimulus level was decreased, and after one incorrect response, the level was increased. This procedure converges on the stimulus level that yields correct responses with a probability of 0.707 (Levitt 1971;Zwislocki and Relkin 2001). The starting level of the stimulus was always clearly above the expected threshold.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This staircase automatically converges on the 50% accuracy threshold. The number of consecutive correct or incorrect responses required can be manipulated to change the percent accuracy to which the staircase will converge (Levitt, 1971).…”
Section: Other Methods For Studying Mental Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stepsize between consecutively presented stimuli was initially set to six times the final value. After each stimulus presenta~on the stepsize was decreased to 6/N, where N is the trial number in that staircase, until a reversal with a stepsize of 1 occurred (Levitt, 1970). As measures of response variability were of some importance for this study, we were particularly concerned that reversals were independent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%