1977
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-08442-8_94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformations of derivation sequences in graph grammars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Candidates are operations like conflux and interchange that are based on independence including parallelization, sequentialization, and shift (cf. [9]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Candidates are operations like conflux and interchange that are based on independence including parallelization, sequentialization, and shift (cf. [9]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shall be explained in section 6, adhesive categories with coproducts are highlevel replacement categories. In particular, we get the local Church-Rosser theorem [14,9].…”
Section: Local Church-rosser Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, several axioms were put forward in [11] in order to prove a local Church-Rosser theorem for such general rewrite systems. Additional axioms were needed to prove a general version of the so-called concurrency theorem [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%