2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation potential predictions for the stress-induced austenite to martensite transformation in steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 3.7 the driving force as a function of the orientation of a grain is plotted in the case of several stress states in the RD and in the TD. Creuziger showed similar plots for several additional stress states [42]. The distributions in these figures show the propensity of an austenite crystal with a particular orientation to transform to martensite irrespective of its presence in the material.…”
Section: Transformation and Austenitic Texturesupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In Figure 3.7 the driving force as a function of the orientation of a grain is plotted in the case of several stress states in the RD and in the TD. Creuziger showed similar plots for several additional stress states [42]. The distributions in these figures show the propensity of an austenite crystal with a particular orientation to transform to martensite irrespective of its presence in the material.…”
Section: Transformation and Austenitic Texturesupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The uncertainties in the phase fraction measurement and crystallographic volume fractions have been quantified and used to provide a metric on the uncertainty in the phase volume fraction. By measuring the phase volume fraction as a function of applied strain, the effect of orientation on the overall deformation can be measured and compared to predictions for transformation rate [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is data to indicate that the transformation will not be distributed evenly as a function of orientation, but particular stress states will cause some orientations to transform at a higher rate than other orientations [4]. Therefore, the distribution of retained austenite as a function of crystallographic orientation and the rate of transformation of a particular orientation is also of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petit et al [4] observed a slower transformation in austenitic grains with 1 0 0 parallel to the rolling direction and a much faster transformation in grains with 1 1 1 parallel to rolling direction in rolled stainless steels. Similarly, Creuziger and Foecle [5] calculated the transformation potential of martensite and demonstrated the importance of austenite orientation. From a calculation of Schmid factors, Zhang et al [6] was able to explain experimental observations that martensite formed easily in Cube-and Goss-oriented austenite during tension, but was difficult to form in 1 1 1 -oriented austenite during compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%