2005
DOI: 10.1080/17448680500337483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation or Bureaucratization? The changing role of community representation in local strategic partnerships in England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rowe's recent ( 2006) work on 'abusive partnerships' narrates that LSPs in developing their Community Strategies, contrary to feeling like enabling and pragmatic spaces, are prescribed and directed from above, where partnerships act to 'airbrush out' legitimate political difference resulting in bland pronouncements where only the least contentious elements make it to the final document. Others have also shown how political and institutional inertia may thwart strategic development and restrict the extent to which local government and its partners could operate pragmatically and without being constrained by national government guidance (Coaffee, 2004;Bailey, 2005;Tewdwr-Jones et al, 2006). Davies (2004) also flags up this issue, describing the contemporary as a 'punctuated phase' of partnership working:…”
Section: Pragmatic Local Delivery Vehicles and Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rowe's recent ( 2006) work on 'abusive partnerships' narrates that LSPs in developing their Community Strategies, contrary to feeling like enabling and pragmatic spaces, are prescribed and directed from above, where partnerships act to 'airbrush out' legitimate political difference resulting in bland pronouncements where only the least contentious elements make it to the final document. Others have also shown how political and institutional inertia may thwart strategic development and restrict the extent to which local government and its partners could operate pragmatically and without being constrained by national government guidance (Coaffee, 2004;Bailey, 2005;Tewdwr-Jones et al, 2006). Davies (2004) also flags up this issue, describing the contemporary as a 'punctuated phase' of partnership working:…”
Section: Pragmatic Local Delivery Vehicles and Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from work exploring community engagement in area-based regeneration, has tended to be characterised by qualitative studies. These have focused on a relatively small number of localities at one period of time and findings have offered insights into ways in which participation pans out within specific local contexts (Bailey, 2005;Bailey & Pill, 2011;Beebeejaun & Grimshaw, 2011;Dargan, 2009;Denters & Klok, 2010;Dinham, 2005;Dinham, 2007;Lawson & Kearns, 2010;Mathers et al, 2008;Robinson et al, 2005;Wallace, 2010). Alternatively, evidence from the NDC programme presented in this paper provides an opportunity to explore relationships between engagement and outcomes over time and across 39 regeneration areas, and in so doing addresses three research questions:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%