2017
DOI: 10.17499/jsser.360862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation of The System of Bilingual Education in The Republic of Tatarstan: Crossover Ethnolinguistic Controversies

Abstract: The relevance of the problem range addressed in the study is conditioned by the system of education functioning under multiculturalism in modern polyethnic societies and their social stability much depending on the balanced use of languages of ethnoses that reside in the region as well as on the respectful attitude to their representatives in daily life. Thus, the system of education has to take into account the ethnic and religious, political, social and cultural requirements of the society offering highquali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, many Tatars and Russians, who were dissatisfied with equalizing the number of hours for studying Tatar and Russian languages that existed before 2018, completely abandoned Tatar lessons later. Most private firms leave their signboards only in Russian, and Tatar-speaking cultural institutions have a limited audience segment and thus low functionality [20]. Outside government institutions and affiliates of firms and banks, those who are firmly convinced speakers of the Tatar language, independently segregate themselves (however, without forming intra-city ghettosneither housing-space, nor family, nor others).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, many Tatars and Russians, who were dissatisfied with equalizing the number of hours for studying Tatar and Russian languages that existed before 2018, completely abandoned Tatar lessons later. Most private firms leave their signboards only in Russian, and Tatar-speaking cultural institutions have a limited audience segment and thus low functionality [20]. Outside government institutions and affiliates of firms and banks, those who are firmly convinced speakers of the Tatar language, independently segregate themselves (however, without forming intra-city ghettosneither housing-space, nor family, nor others).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, to a question "What is your attitude to a problem of the Tatar language teaching in the educational institutions of Tatarstan?" included in our survey in autumn 2017, the response "The Tatar language shall be compulsory studied by all students, regardless of their ethnic origin, on par with the Russian language" was chosen only by 4.2% of Russian respondents and 24.9% of Tatars, though in 2011 the percentage was 14% and 44% respectively (Maximova et al, 2017).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course of our work, we also studied the articles of modern researchers devoted to the changes taking place in the education system in Russia (Maximova, Belyaev, & Laukart-Gorbacheva, 2017, Larionova, Korneyeva, & Yusupova, 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%