2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-003-0729-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation of the monocotyledonous Alstroemeria by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Abstract: An efficient procedure is described for the transformation of the monocotyledonous Alstroemeria by Agrobacterium tumefaciens via callus regeneration. Calli derived from ovules were co-cultivated with A. tumefaciens strains EHA101 and LBA4404, which harbored the binary vector plasmids pIG121Hm and pTOK233, respectively. These plasmids contain the beta-glucuronidase gene ( gusA) as a reporter gene and the hygromycin phosphotransferase and neomycin phosphotransferase II ( nptII) genes as selective markers. Inocul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monocotyledonous plants, in particular cereal plants, are naturally outside of the host range of A. tumefaciens, however, so the development of a system for the genetic transformation of monocotyledons has been slow (Hiei et al 1997). Nonetheless, successful transformations has been reported in some monocotyledonous plants, including Oryza (Hiei et al 1994), Hordeum (Tingay et al 1997), Humulus (Horlemann et al 2003) and Alstroemeria (Akutsu et al 2004). The bombardment of cells and tissues, another option for genetic improvement, has been attempted in many plant species (Iida et al 1991;Christou et al 1992;Batista et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Monocotyledonous plants, in particular cereal plants, are naturally outside of the host range of A. tumefaciens, however, so the development of a system for the genetic transformation of monocotyledons has been slow (Hiei et al 1997). Nonetheless, successful transformations has been reported in some monocotyledonous plants, including Oryza (Hiei et al 1994), Hordeum (Tingay et al 1997), Humulus (Horlemann et al 2003) and Alstroemeria (Akutsu et al 2004). The bombardment of cells and tissues, another option for genetic improvement, has been attempted in many plant species (Iida et al 1991;Christou et al 1992;Batista et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The sequence information can be used to isolate cDNA clones, and these can be used for plant transformation studies to modify gene expression levels. Although Agrobacterium-and/or particle bombardment-mediated transformation techniques are technically challenging in monocot plants, they have been successfully applied in some monocots including Phalaenopsis, Agapanthus, Muscari, Alstroemeria, and Tricyrtis (Adachi et al, 2005;Akutsu et al, 2004;Mishiba et al, 2005;Suzuki and Nakano, 2002;Suzuki et al, 2001). These monocot species can be used for studies to modify floral organ development by overexpression or reduction of B-and C-class floral organ identity genes.…”
Section: Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Agrobacterium-mediated transformation does not require the use of protoplasts, and the T-DNA is stably integrated into genomic DNA in low copy number, it is preferred by many breeders using formerly protoplasts or particle bombardment technique. Although monocots are generally considered to be outside the host range of A. tumefaciens (De Cleene and Deley 1976), A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation has been reported in Gramineae such as Festuca arundinacea (Bettany et al 2003), buffel (Batra and Kumar 2003), bentgrass , Alstroemeria (Akutsu et al 2004), typha (Nandakumar et al 2005) and E. sibiricus cv. 'chuancao No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%