2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-13225-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation of Measure on Wiener Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
188
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
188
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[10]. More precisely, the next proposition recovers and extends Theorem 4 of [11] as a consequence of Proposition 3.1 below.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…[10]. More precisely, the next proposition recovers and extends Theorem 4 of [11] as a consequence of Proposition 3.1 below.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…e.g. [18]) ℓ(y) = exp ρδ x − ρ By the same arguments as in [5] or [9] and by the assumptions of proposition 5.1…”
Section: An Extended Version Of the De Bruijn Identitymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The following close (but weaker) statement was obtained in the recent paper [10]: if f is a function measurable with respect to a Gaussian measure p on a separable Banaeh space X defined on a #-measurable set A and satisfying there the Lipschitz condition along the Cameron-Martin space E, then there exists a p-measurable function on X satisfying the same condition and coinciding with f #-almost everywhere. This statement follows from the theorem above, since f has a Borel modification satisfying the same condition on a Boret subset B C A with p(B) = #(A).…”
Section: If(= + H) -/(=)1 -< Llhllmentioning
confidence: 78%