1974
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1974.tb00100.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation of Dipole Resistivity Sounding Measurements Over Layered Earth by Linear Digital Filtering *

Abstract: The technique of linear digital filtering as developed for the direct interpretation of Schlumberger and Wenner soundings (Ghosh 1971) has been applied here for the derivation of the resistivity transform function from the field dipole measurements as the first step in directly interpreting dipole data. Filter coefficients for this transformation have been worked out for the radial‐polar, perpendicular and parallel (30°) arrays of dipole sounding. The procedure combines speed with accuracy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Convolution of the input G with the filter H yields the output F. A convolution integral, relating linearly the Schlumberger input resistivity and the output resistivity transform, was shown by Ghosh (1971a), who consequently developed the filters for interpreting the resistivity measurements (Ghosh 1971a,b). The principle was later applied to dipole-dipole sounding measurements (Das, Ghosh and Biewinga 1974;Ghosh 1974, Nyman andLandisman 1977) as well as to EM sounding measurements over layered earth (Koefoed, Ghosh and Polman 1972). Equation (3) giving the apparent resistivity for the two-electrode configuration, can be expressed as a convolution integral by putting the variables on a logarithmic scale as x = In (s); y = In (l/A).…”
Section: Field Lay-outmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convolution of the input G with the filter H yields the output F. A convolution integral, relating linearly the Schlumberger input resistivity and the output resistivity transform, was shown by Ghosh (1971a), who consequently developed the filters for interpreting the resistivity measurements (Ghosh 1971a,b). The principle was later applied to dipole-dipole sounding measurements (Das, Ghosh and Biewinga 1974;Ghosh 1974, Nyman andLandisman 1977) as well as to EM sounding measurements over layered earth (Koefoed, Ghosh and Polman 1972). Equation (3) giving the apparent resistivity for the two-electrode configuration, can be expressed as a convolution integral by putting the variables on a logarithmic scale as x = In (s); y = In (l/A).…”
Section: Field Lay-outmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Das, Ghosh and Biewinga 1974) which present uncertainties and difficulties in quantitative interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Das, Ghosh and Biewinga (1974) pointed out the "high-frequency'' nature of some causes of noise, and Bernabini and Cardarelli (1978) drew attention to the possible existence of strong " low-frequency " noise. Absence of noise undoubtedly facilitates the geophysicist's interpretative efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, experience has demonstrated that noise contamination of the field apparent resistivity sounding curves, often in the form of widely scattered data, has some probability of occurrence and in some situations is even the rule. Das, Ghosh and Biewinga (1974) pointed out the "high-frequency'' nature of some causes of noise, and Bernabini and Cardarelli (1978) drew attention to the possible existence of strong " low-frequency " noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%