2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02942296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation of a filamentous fungusCryphonectria parasitica usingAgrobacterium tumefaciens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, AGL1, which belonged to the succinamopine type, might be more suitable for transformation with R. toruloides NP11 than LBA4404 and GV3101 belonging to octopine and nopaline, respectively. A similar result was observed in Park and Kim [19], in which transformation efficiency was higher with AGL1 than with GV3101 and LBA4404 for Cryphonectria parasitica . Varied transformation efficiency was also observed even in the same type of Agrobacterium .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, AGL1, which belonged to the succinamopine type, might be more suitable for transformation with R. toruloides NP11 than LBA4404 and GV3101 belonging to octopine and nopaline, respectively. A similar result was observed in Park and Kim [19], in which transformation efficiency was higher with AGL1 than with GV3101 and LBA4404 for Cryphonectria parasitica . Varied transformation efficiency was also observed even in the same type of Agrobacterium .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar results were also reported in Harpophora oryzae and Magnaporthe grise , in which the transformation efficiency was increased as the ratio of A. tumefaciens to yeast [22,23]. Excessive growth of A. tumefaciens during cocultivation was reported to inhibit the recipient's growth by Park and Kim [19], and Meyer also observed that fewer transformants were detected as the A. tumefaciens input number increased from 3 × 10 8 cells to 6 × 10 8 cells [24]. This effect was probably due to the nutrient limitation in the cocultivation medium, resulting in a growth disadvantage for the transformants with fewer microbes [24].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The hypervirulent Agrobacterium strain we used for ATMT was not reported to have a preference for multiple insertions in other mutant screens [ 3 , 40 ]. However, it was described as particularly effective for the transformation of filamentous fungi [ 78 ]. This observation is consistent with an increased frequency of T-DNA transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various Agrobacterium strains have been used to transform Cryphonectria parasitica. In C. parasitica, Agrobacterium AGL-1 was more efficient for transformation than LBA4404 (Park and Kim 2004). These results suggest that the difference in transformation efficiency was due to the genetic background of the A. tumefaciens strains (Krishnamohan et al 2001), the effect of inhibitor from H. mompa, and the strain specificity of A. tumefaciens for H. mompa strains.…”
Section: Optimization Of Transformation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 91%