2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation from SysML to RePast and Back

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for the transformation automation, we notice that some researchers transform their models relying on a transformation language; for instance, "AndroMDA" in [17] and [28]. We have also "Acceleo" in [23] and "ATL" in [24], [27], [29], and our proposal. However, we remark that in some methods, the models' transformation is performed via tool; such as "Protégé" [21] and "Poseidon" [22] in [20].…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, for the transformation automation, we notice that some researchers transform their models relying on a transformation language; for instance, "AndroMDA" in [17] and [28]. We have also "Acceleo" in [23] and "ATL" in [24], [27], [29], and our proposal. However, we remark that in some methods, the models' transformation is performed via tool; such as "Protégé" [21] and "Poseidon" [22] in [20].…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Concerning the model construction criteria, all approaches position their models in the MDA approach. For that purpose, methods [20], [24], [25] as well as our proposal, start their generation from the CIM level, while the rest of the methods starting their models' generation from the PIM level except the paper [29] deal with the PIM level and also PSM level for their reverse transformation. However, most authors use the graphical representation for their source and target models, except the methods dealing with the generation of the PSM models, which generate textual models format.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations