2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5479-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforaminal endoscopic decompression for thoracic spinal stenosis under local anesthesia

Abstract: Transforaminal endoscopic decompression is a safe and an effective surgical approach for the treatment of thoracic spinal stenosis. For patients with thoracic spinal stenosis, accurate diagnosis and elaborate surgical planning should be highlighted, and the surgical outcome can be favorable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, with the development of endoscopic surgical equipment and technology, minimally invasive spinal surgeries can be performed with various endoscopic techniques for the lumbar, cervical, and thoracic regions [22][23][24]. There has been a growing body of literature that not only con rms the e cacy of the endoscopic technique but also underscores the advantages with respect to less morbidity and safer complications [3,4,[25][26][27][28][29]. Percutaneous endoscopic spinal surgeries for lumbar, cervical, and thoracic regions categorized according to the surgical approaches are as follows: transforaminal lumbar, interlaminar lumbar, anterior cervical, posterior cervical, posterior thoracic, and posterolateral thoracic [21,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the development of endoscopic surgical equipment and technology, minimally invasive spinal surgeries can be performed with various endoscopic techniques for the lumbar, cervical, and thoracic regions [22][23][24]. There has been a growing body of literature that not only con rms the e cacy of the endoscopic technique but also underscores the advantages with respect to less morbidity and safer complications [3,4,[25][26][27][28][29]. Percutaneous endoscopic spinal surgeries for lumbar, cervical, and thoracic regions categorized according to the surgical approaches are as follows: transforaminal lumbar, interlaminar lumbar, anterior cervical, posterior cervical, posterior thoracic, and posterolateral thoracic [21,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PED is less invasive than MED for selected patients with lumbar degenerative disease [ 19 , 20 ]. Jia [ 8 ] performed the PED for the treatment of one OLF case at T2/3. Miao [ 9 ] also reported successful PED in treating two cases with unilateral OLF at T9/10 and T3/4 using the PED with paramedian approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on improvements in optical technology and equipment, good outcomes and advantages of PED for lumbar degenerative disease have been used in recent years [ 6 , 7 ] . However, there were few reports of PED for the treatment of TSS [ 8 , 9 ]. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of PED versus PDL for TSS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the development of endoscopic surgical equipment and technology, minimally invasive spinal surgeries can be performed with various endoscopic techniques for the lumbar, cervical, and thoracic regions [23][24][25]. There has been a growing body of literature that not only con rms the e cacy of the endoscopic technique but also underscores the advantages with respect to less morbidity and safer complications [3,4,[26][27][28][29][30]. Percutaneous endoscopic spinal surgeries for lumbar, cervical, and thoracic regions categorized according to the surgical approaches are as follows: transforaminal lumbar, interlaminar lumbar, anterior cervical, posterior cervical, posterior thoracic, and posterolateral thoracic [23,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%