2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8396(01)00015-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfinite interpolation over implicitly defined sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rvachev et al [30] showed that such a function representation of lower dimensional cells was quite useful in solving interpolation and boundary value problems.…”
Section: Implicit Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rvachev et al [30] showed that such a function representation of lower dimensional cells was quite useful in solving interpolation and boundary value problems.…”
Section: Implicit Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the entire point set is represented by a single realvalued function that allows for combining constructive solid modeling with scalar field techniques based on the theory of Rfunctions [31,26,[30][31][32][33]. For k-dimensional objects in nD space with k<n, the main idea is that the function F will be zero only at the points of this object and negative everywhere else.…”
Section: Function Representation Of Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rvachev et al [30] show that such a function representation of dimensionally heterogeneous objects is very useful in solving interpolation and boundary value problems. See also applications in [33].…”
Section: Function Representation Of Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, eight corresponding intersection points between those rays and their closest adjacent contour lines are identified, and the elevation value F(n) is computed from these intersection points using the inverse distance weight method (Figure 1) based on these eight crossing points (C1, C2… C8). However, this approach cannot reflect the topography of mountaintops and depressions with sufficient resolution for most purposes (Figure 2) (Rvachev et al, 2001;Dinis et al, 2007;Watson, 1999). An example to illustrate the drawbacks of the weighted moving average technique: it is hard to determine whether P is in a valley or on top of a hill.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%