2016
DOI: 10.17017/jfish.v4i3.2016.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transferable chloramphenicol resistance determinant in luminous Vibrio harveyi from penaeid shrimp Penaeus monodon larvae

Abstract: Antibiotic-resistant luminous Vibrio harveyi strains isolated from Penaeus monodon larvae were screened for the possession of transferable resistance determinants. All the strains were resistant to chloramphenicol and the determinant coding for chloramphenicol resistance was transferred to Escherichia coli at frequencies of 9.50x10 -4 to 4.20x10 . The results probably suggest the excessive use of chloramphenicol in shrimp hatcheries to combat luminous vibriosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tarda and V. harveyi through chlorination, highlighting aspects such as the minimum bactericidal concentrations of chlorine, the duration needed for specific inactivation levels, the effect of interfering organic compounds, and microbial inactivation by electrolytic chlorination. However, several substantial issues require further clarification: (i) No previous studies have determined the Ct values for inactivating these two fish pathogens, which are crucial for preventing the misuse of chlorination in aquaculture systems, (ii) the speciation of CPOs during seawater chlorination and their influence on the inactivation of these fish pathogens have not been assessed, and (iii) environmental factors, including pH, natural organic matter (NOM), and temperature, have been scarcely investigated to these fish pathogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tarda and V. harveyi through chlorination, highlighting aspects such as the minimum bactericidal concentrations of chlorine, the duration needed for specific inactivation levels, the effect of interfering organic compounds, and microbial inactivation by electrolytic chlorination. However, several substantial issues require further clarification: (i) No previous studies have determined the Ct values for inactivating these two fish pathogens, which are crucial for preventing the misuse of chlorination in aquaculture systems, (ii) the speciation of CPOs during seawater chlorination and their influence on the inactivation of these fish pathogens have not been assessed, and (iii) environmental factors, including pH, natural organic matter (NOM), and temperature, have been scarcely investigated to these fish pathogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%