2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transferability of ALS-based forest attribute models when predicting with drone-based image point cloud data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason for the relatively small rate of improvement for Ho in particular, is that models for Ho most frequently include a large height percentile as explanatory variable, which is less affected by sensor effect and flying altitude compared to smaller height percentiles and many other metrics representing density and height variation (Naesset 2009). Height was also the forest attribute most successfully predicted using an external model by van Ewijk et al (2020) and Toivonen et al (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for the relatively small rate of improvement for Ho in particular, is that models for Ho most frequently include a large height percentile as explanatory variable, which is less affected by sensor effect and flying altitude compared to smaller height percentiles and many other metrics representing density and height variation (Naesset 2009). Height was also the forest attribute most successfully predicted using an external model by van Ewijk et al (2020) and Toivonen et al (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be an interesting option to interpolate general diameter-height relationship rasters for the whole of Finland and to test the information as additional variables in nationwide models. Most recently, Toivonen et al (2021) predicted Hdom and V for the Liperi test plots by examining multiple ALS-based models from different regions in DIPC-based predictions. They used the same data and estimation methods presented in study III to fit fixed ALSbased Hdom and V models for all 22 regions.…”
Section: Further Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, [23] achieved similar prediction accuracy for shrubs in sagebrush steppe across different elevations but found inconsistencies in the prediction of grasses and bare ground. [24] showed how spatial heterogeneity due to diverse forest structures results in substantial differences between drone data and field measurements (more than 50%) when models were transferred to test sites for predicting forest attributes like stem volume. However, in agricultural systems, the transferability of drone-based models appears to be less affected, possibly due to their typically homogeneous setup [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%