2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01537-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer-robot task scheduling in flexible job shop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed IGA, it is compared with state-of-the-art algorithms, namely, the MILP model [3], CP2 [29], LAHC [3], BRKGA [11], GATS [36], and PGA [35]. The comparison results of the five sets of benchmark data sets are shown in Tables 2-7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To prove the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed IGA, it is compared with state-of-the-art algorithms, namely, the MILP model [3], CP2 [29], LAHC [3], BRKGA [11], GATS [36], and PGA [35]. The comparison results of the five sets of benchmark data sets are shown in Tables 2-7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lacomme et al [28] designed a disjunctive graph-based framework for modeling JSP-AGV and an improved memetic algorithm. Ham [29] first developed a constraint programming model and a new set of benchmark instances.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Fjsp-agvmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of course, it would be of great interest to study the calibration engineer scheduling problem in distributed multiple‐machine settings where several calibration engineers are available. It is also worth considering the coordination of machine calibrations in some stages or machines of a flow shop (Ferone et al., 2020; de Siqueira et al., 2020; Hakeem‐Ur‐Rehman et al., 2021), a job shop (Benttaleb et al., 2019; Abedi et al., 2020; Ham, 2020), or a parallel machine setting where a server is in charge of setups (Arnaout, 2017; Bektur and Saraç, 2019; Krim et al., 2020) such that the production runs smoothly from an overall perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time period mentioned in the table is taken using the setup mentioned in Figure 19, and this operation does not involve holding_bay or error zone selection. There is literature published on the scheduler presented in Reference [38][39][40][41], but, to the best of authors' knowledge, there is no published literature on the timing details of the same scheduler which provides an integration of a MES and AIV. So, a fair comparison of timing is not possible.…”
Section: Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%