1998
DOI: 10.1006/mare.1998.0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer pricing negotiation outcomes and the impact of negotiator mixed-motives and culture: empirical evidence from the U.S. and Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has found that target levels have effects on performance, with moderately difficult goals enhancing group performance (Fisher et al, 2003), with evidence that, in practice, targets tend to be 80 to 90 per cent achievable and this is regarded as desirable (Merchant and Manzoni, 1989). Aggressive target setting in situations where there is need for cooperation between units is not associated with higher performance (Chan, 1998), as managers become less willing to make concessions and take longer to reach agreements (Smith et al, 1982). However, the embedding of continuous improvement into targets appears increasingly inescapable, as companies face competitive and globalised markets (Chenhall, 2003).…”
Section: Target Settingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Research has found that target levels have effects on performance, with moderately difficult goals enhancing group performance (Fisher et al, 2003), with evidence that, in practice, targets tend to be 80 to 90 per cent achievable and this is regarded as desirable (Merchant and Manzoni, 1989). Aggressive target setting in situations where there is need for cooperation between units is not associated with higher performance (Chan, 1998), as managers become less willing to make concessions and take longer to reach agreements (Smith et al, 1982). However, the embedding of continuous improvement into targets appears increasingly inescapable, as companies face competitive and globalised markets (Chenhall, 2003).…”
Section: Target Settingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Generally, national culture is an extensively researched variable in international negotiations, and its impact on negotiation process and outcome is well accepted Adler & Graham 1989;Brett 1998b;Brett et al 1998a;Chan 1998;Graham & Mintu-Wimsat 1997;Kharbanda & Stallworthy 1991;. Most of these studies were conducted in a face-to-face experimental setting and concentrated on culture's impact on negotiation processes, strategies, atmosphere, and outcomes.…”
Section: Research Focus and Model 21 Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of 'atmosphere' includes variables describing the personal attitudes of the negotiators during the process. Chan, Graham and others suggest two main factors that contribute to the atmosphere and process: negotiation strategy and attractiveness [22][23][24].…”
Section: Cultural Influences On Negotiationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negotiation strategy reflects the negotiators' concern for their own outcome and their concern for the other party's outcome [23]. By combining the two dimensions of concern four strategies have been proposed.…”
Section: Cultural Influences On Negotiationsmentioning
confidence: 99%