Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography 2006
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012370537-2/50029-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer Phenomena in Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, k eff, salt was approximated with r P /3 = 0.0083 mm/s (Rodrigues, 1997). For the protein species, the penetration correlation (Guiochon et al, 2006) enabled the calculation of effective mass transfer parameters k eff, i depending on the hydrodynamic radii of the mAbs and the linear flow rate. Identical hydrodynamic radii of 73 Å were computed based on full‐length homology models resulting in a k eff,i of 0.0013 mm/s for WT, M1, and M2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, k eff, salt was approximated with r P /3 = 0.0083 mm/s (Rodrigues, 1997). For the protein species, the penetration correlation (Guiochon et al, 2006) enabled the calculation of effective mass transfer parameters k eff, i depending on the hydrodynamic radii of the mAbs and the linear flow rate. Identical hydrodynamic radii of 73 Å were computed based on full‐length homology models resulting in a k eff,i of 0.0013 mm/s for WT, M1, and M2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, k eff, salt was approximated with r P /3 = 0.0083 mm/s (Rodrigues, 1997). For the protein species, the penetration correlation (Guiochon et al, 2006) 2 visualizes the Yamamoto correlation (Equation 7), which enabled the analytical solution of the characteristic charge ν i and equilibrium constant k eq, i based on the five LGE experiments per mAb.…”
Section: Chromatography Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%