2011
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer of Training between Music and Speech: Common Processing, Attention, and Memory

Abstract: After a brief historical perspective of the relationship between language and music, we review our work on transfer of training from music to speech that aimed at testing the general hypothesis that musicians should be more sensitive than non-musicians to speech sounds. In light of recent results in the literature, we argue that when long-term experience in one domain influences acoustic processing in the other domain, results can be interpreted as common acoustic processing. But when long-term experience in o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
266
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
20
266
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted in this respect that, although vowel length is not contrastive in French, controls nevertheless performed as well as musicians in this task, possibly because the natural difference in vowel duration was large enough (270 msec) to be easily perceived by nonmusician controls. Taken together, these findings add support to the hypothesis of transfer effects between music and speech (Asaridou & McQueen, 2013;Besson et al, 2011), with near transfer for acoustic cues common to music and speech such as frequency and with far transfer to unfamiliar linguistic cues such as aspiration.…”
Section: Cascading Effects From Perception To Word Learningsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It should be noted in this respect that, although vowel length is not contrastive in French, controls nevertheless performed as well as musicians in this task, possibly because the natural difference in vowel duration was large enough (270 msec) to be easily perceived by nonmusician controls. Taken together, these findings add support to the hypothesis of transfer effects between music and speech (Asaridou & McQueen, 2013;Besson et al, 2011), with near transfer for acoustic cues common to music and speech such as frequency and with far transfer to unfamiliar linguistic cues such as aspiration.…”
Section: Cascading Effects From Perception To Word Learningsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This early focus on acoustical features converges with the evidence reviewed here suggesting that the processing of music and speech overlaps in posterior auditory cortex (basic acoustic processing) and becomes more differentiated anteriorly (domain-specific representation) [24,40]. However, the expanded OPERA hypothesis [28] incorporates the idea of shared cognitive processing into the discussion of neural overlap, based on the proposals that musical training enhances auditory attention and working memory [52,53]. Indeed, there is abundant evidence that attention sharpens sensory encoding in primary brain areas (see [54] for a meta-analysis of attention-related modulations in the auditory cortex).…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Indeed, assignment to musical training has been found to yield structural changes in auditory and motor cortices that correlate with performance on melody discrimination and finger tapping tasks, respectively ( Although the above results suggest some transfer attributable to musical training (see also Lappe et al, 2008;Besson et al, 2011), one remaining question is whether the occurrence of transfer is selective to specific points in development. Can musical training-related cognitive differences persist beyond childhood?…”
Section: Expertise and Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 94%