2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00230.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer of training: A review and new insights

Abstract: Even successful training programs cannot guarantee that newly learned knowledge and skills will be transferred to the workplace. This has led to researchers’ interests in understanding the transfer process. Notwithstanding that transfer issues have been studied for several decades, the recent emphasis on ‘workplace learning’, especially the so‐called ‘situated learning’ approach, suggests that conventional training transfer research may be inadequate to understand the dynamics of performance improvement throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
159
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
8
159
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…During the past thirty years, many researchers have tried to provide an answer to the question of which factors influence the transfer process (e.g., Baldwin & Ford, 1988;Cheng & Ho, 2001;Holton et al, 2000;Colquitt et al, 2000;Cheng & Hampson, 2008). Work environment characteristics have often been referred to as the transfer climate or factors perceived by trainees to encourage or discourage their use of KSAs learned in training and in the workplace (Cromwell & Kolb, 2004).…”
Section: Work Environment Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past thirty years, many researchers have tried to provide an answer to the question of which factors influence the transfer process (e.g., Baldwin & Ford, 1988;Cheng & Ho, 2001;Holton et al, 2000;Colquitt et al, 2000;Cheng & Hampson, 2008). Work environment characteristics have often been referred to as the transfer climate or factors perceived by trainees to encourage or discourage their use of KSAs learned in training and in the workplace (Cromwell & Kolb, 2004).…”
Section: Work Environment Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the recent attention for individual strengths, most developmental processes in organizations are still based on a deficit model in which a person's area of weakness is seen as their greatest area of opportunity (Bouskila-Yam & Kluger, 2011;Roberts, Dutton, Spreitzer, Heaphy, & Quinn, 2005;Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). Training, coaching, performance feedback or on the job learning processes (Cheng & Hampson, 2008;Jordan & Audia, 2012;Passmore, 2007) are often seen as a means to narrow identified competence gaps and to remediate employee deficits, and can indeed lead to considerable performance improvement (Dunn & Shriner, 1999;Ericsson, Nandagopal, & Roring, 2009;LaFleur & Hyten, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Cheng and Hampson (2008) have recently remarked: "[a]s the idea that work has become increasingly knowledge based has taken hold, investing in intangible assets-especially human capital-has been regarded as a core strategy for competitive advantage" (p. 327). A key contribution to understanding these matters is found in the work of Ikujiro Nonaka.…”
Section: Competitiveness and Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 98%