2019
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer of the waterfall source isolate Pectobacterium carotovorum M022 to Pectobacterium fontis sp. nov., a deep-branching species within the genus Pectobacterium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For "P. zantedeschiae", the three strains hosted at CIRM-CFBP were all isolated from Araceae plants, as the other strains described for this species [27]. Concerning the recently described freshwater environmental species P. aquaticum [17], P. fontis [21] and P. polonicum [25] and the strain CFBP 8739, we were surprised that these species had either no representative in the CIRM-CFBP or only strains deposited following the recent description of the species. The fact that no strain representative of these species was isolated from crop plants and ornamentals along the 75-year period that covered our analysis strongly suggests that these species are not an important threat for crop plants and ornamentals.…”
Section: Analysis Of Species Host Range and Geographic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For "P. zantedeschiae", the three strains hosted at CIRM-CFBP were all isolated from Araceae plants, as the other strains described for this species [27]. Concerning the recently described freshwater environmental species P. aquaticum [17], P. fontis [21] and P. polonicum [25] and the strain CFBP 8739, we were surprised that these species had either no representative in the CIRM-CFBP or only strains deposited following the recent description of the species. The fact that no strain representative of these species was isolated from crop plants and ornamentals along the 75-year period that covered our analysis strongly suggests that these species are not an important threat for crop plants and ornamentals.…”
Section: Analysis Of Species Host Range and Geographic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, new Pectobacterium species were progressively described, most of them recently on the basis of whole genome sequence analysis. Today, the Pectobacterium genus encompasses 17 recognized species Pectobacterium actinidiae [15], Pectobacterium aquaticum [17], Pectobacterium aroidearum [18], Pectobacterium atrosepticum [14], Pectobacterium betavasculorum [14], Pectobacterium brasiliense [15], Pectobacterium cacticida [9,19], Pectobacterium carotovorum [8,15,20], Pectobacterium fontis [21], Pectobacterium odoriferum [15], Pectobacterium parmentieri [22], Pectobacterium parvum [23], Pectobacterium polaris [24], Pectobacterium polonicum [25], Pectobacterium punjabense [26], Pectobacterium versatile [15] and Pectobacterium wasabiae [14] and 2 proposed species not yet validated by had hoc committees:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus Pectobacterium comprises the following species: Pectobacterium carotovorum, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium betavasculorum, Pectobacterium cacticida, Pectobacterium aroidearum (Nabhan et al 2013), Pectobacterium wasabiae, Pectobacterium parmentieri (Khayi et al 2016), Pectobacterium polaris (Dees et al 2017), Pectobacterium peruviense (Waleron et al 2018), and Pectobacterium punjabense (Sarfraz et al 2018). In addition, Pectobacterium zantedeschiae (Waleron et al 2019a), Pectobacterium aquaticum (Pedron et al 2019), Pectobacterium fontis (Oulghazi et al 2019), Pectobacterium polonicum (Waleron et al 2019b), and the new genomospecies, Candidatus Pectobacterium maceratum (Shirshikov et al 2018;Waleron et al 2019c) are recently added to the genus. P. carotovorum isolates are subsequently divided into three different subspecies viz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%