1989
DOI: 10.1086/167762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer of line radiation in a magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LSD procedure is adequate in the weak-field approximation, if one only uses lines that have the same shape as one another, and assumes wavelength-independent limb darkening. The weak-field approximation assumes that the Zeeman splitting is a fraction of the Doppler width (Jefferies et al 1989), which is indeed the case for HD 96446. The mask was first computed using a Kurucz ATLAS 9 atmosphere model with T eff = 22 000 K and log g = 4.0.…”
Section: Observations and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The LSD procedure is adequate in the weak-field approximation, if one only uses lines that have the same shape as one another, and assumes wavelength-independent limb darkening. The weak-field approximation assumes that the Zeeman splitting is a fraction of the Doppler width (Jefferies et al 1989), which is indeed the case for HD 96446. The mask was first computed using a Kurucz ATLAS 9 atmosphere model with T eff = 22 000 K and log g = 4.0.…”
Section: Observations and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Then, a proportionality exists between the observed local Stokes V profile and the spectral derivative of the observed local Stokes I profile, which can be derived from the polarized transfer equation using a first-order Taylor expansion of the line profile function (e.g., Jefferies et al 1989). This proportionality or linear relation can be written as…”
Section: Disk-integrated Weak-field Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a first order approximation, the circularly polarized Stokes V signal should scale with Φ L , whereas the linear polarization L = Q 2 + U 2 should scale with Φ 2 T (Jefferies et al 1989). From the observed profiles, we derived the maximal linear and circular polarization of the 1564.8 nm line (L max and V max , see Sect.…”
Section: Reliability Of Proxies In Magnetic Flux Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%