1973
DOI: 10.3758/bf03327734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer of learned discrimination from peripheral to central auditory stimulation in cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that stimulation of two nonreticular sites failed to improve flicker discrimination accuracy in spite of the fact that stimulation of at least one of these structures is known to act as a salient cue (Colavita, 1973) suggests that MRF stimulation did not improve discrimination accuracy by acting as a salient cue. These findings also suggest that the effect was anatomically specific to stimulation of the MRF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding that stimulation of two nonreticular sites failed to improve flicker discrimination accuracy in spite of the fact that stimulation of at least one of these structures is known to act as a salient cue (Colavita, 1973) suggests that MRF stimulation did not improve discrimination accuracy by acting as a salient cue. These findings also suggest that the effect was anatomically specific to stimulation of the MRF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The inferior colliculus was selected as one area because stimulating that part of the primary auditory pathway can act as a salient cue (Colavita, 1973;Nieder & Neff, 1961). The limbic system was chosen as a second area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%