1990
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-40-4-426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer of Kingella indologenes (Snell and Lapage 1976) to the Genus Suttonella gen. nov. as Suttonella indologenes comb. nov.; Transfer of Bacteroides nodosus (Beveridge 1941) to the Genus Dichelobacter gen. nov. as Dichelobacter nodosus comb. nov.; and Assignment of the Genera Cardiobacterium, Dichelobacter, and Suttonella to Cardiobacteriaceae fam. nov. in the Gamma Division of Proteobacteria on the Basis of 16S rRNA Sequence Comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The organization of the D. nodosus fur region was different from that of other characterized fur regions, although some conservation exists among members of the ␥ subclass of the Proteobacteria (37), to which D. nodosus belongs (13). The presence of an rpoH gene upstream of the fur gene was unique to D. nodosus, and although rpoH was not part of an operon with fur and there was no sigma32 consensus binding site in the fur promoter region, we cannot rule out the possibility that Fur may regulate rpoH, causing a discrete set of genes to be expressed, as observed in S. oneidensis (58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organization of the D. nodosus fur region was different from that of other characterized fur regions, although some conservation exists among members of the ␥ subclass of the Proteobacteria (37), to which D. nodosus belongs (13). The presence of an rpoH gene upstream of the fur gene was unique to D. nodosus, and although rpoH was not part of an operon with fur and there was no sigma32 consensus binding site in the fur promoter region, we cannot rule out the possibility that Fur may regulate rpoH, causing a discrete set of genes to be expressed, as observed in S. oneidensis (58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low similarity level again indicates that there is a large genetic distance between the new taxon and its closest relatives. Also from the viewpoint of direct sequencing, this genetic distance corresponds to the genomic range within several bacterial families (e.g., the family Cardiobacteriaceae, whose members cluster at a similarity level of more than 93% [15]). We therefore propose a new genus, Omithobacteri'urn, and a new species, 0. rhinotracheale, to accommodate this taxon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Gram-negative anaerobic rod-shaped bacterium belongs to the Gammaproteobacteria [Dewhirst et al, 1990;La Fontaine et al, 1990] and represents the essential causative agent of ovine footrot. Footrot is regarded as the most important bacterial disease of sheep, resulting in heavy economic losses in wool and meat industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%