“…Thus, the present study is the first one in the series to simultaneously analyze teacher influences and peer influences on relational thinking. The present study extends other studies using this corpus (Jadallah et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2012Lin et al, , 2014 and the research of other investigators (Mercer, 2008) by exploring the joint effects of teacher-student and student-student interaction on growth in relational thinking. We sought to determine the proximal influence of teachers' scaffolding moves on students' relational thinking; that is, student thinking displayed during the next few turns for speaking in a discussion.…”
Section: Relational Thinking In Collaborative Reasoning Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…While this study showed the snow ball phenomenon as a new kind of student thinking, it did not explore the influence of teacher scaffolding moves. The other two studies using this corpus (Lin et al, 2014, and the present study) explored the benefits of CR on relational thinking.…”
Section: Collaborative Reasoning Approach To Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a concurrent study involving 36 discussions from the same corpus as the present study, Lin et al (2014) reported an individual growth curve model of changes in students' relational thinking across 10 CR discussions over a 5-week period. Relational think ing was operationalized as use of an explicit linguistic marker for relational thinking, such as BECAUSE.…”
Section: Relational Thinking In Collaborative Reasoning Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The current study is one of several new studies that seek to answer these questions using the same extensive corpus of 180 CR discussions running to over 31,000 turns of speaking. Given the richness of our data set, over the past years our research team has conducted four microgenetic studies (Jadallah et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2012Lin et al, , 2014 and the current study). Each of the studies has targeted different aspects of these questions.…”
Section: Collaborative Reasoning Approach To Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-status children generated more relational thinking and provided more support and refutation to their peers. However, Lin et al (2014) did not take teacher influences into consideration.…”
Section: Relational Thinking In Collaborative Reasoning Discussionmentioning
This study examined the influence of teachers' instructional moves on students' relational thinking during small-group collaborative discussions. One hundred and twenty 4th grade students and 6 teachers participated in a series of 10 discussions, generating a video-recorded corpus containing 32,511 turns for speaking. A microanalysis of a subset of the corpus showed that teacher prompts for relational thinking, rather than lower level prompts or prompts for evaluation, had an immediate effect on student relational thinking, triggering further relational thinking from students over several speaking turns. Students were unlikely to emulate a teacher's relational thinking strategy but highly likely to emulate another student's. Behavioral management but not cognitive management increased the likelihood of relational thinking. Specific praise for cognitive or social strategies enhanced relational thinking, and the bidirectional association between praise and relational thinking sug gested a transactional model of teacher-student interaction. The results underscore the importance of teacher influences in peer collaboration, even when the absolute rate of teacher talk is low.
“…Thus, the present study is the first one in the series to simultaneously analyze teacher influences and peer influences on relational thinking. The present study extends other studies using this corpus (Jadallah et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2012Lin et al, , 2014 and the research of other investigators (Mercer, 2008) by exploring the joint effects of teacher-student and student-student interaction on growth in relational thinking. We sought to determine the proximal influence of teachers' scaffolding moves on students' relational thinking; that is, student thinking displayed during the next few turns for speaking in a discussion.…”
Section: Relational Thinking In Collaborative Reasoning Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…While this study showed the snow ball phenomenon as a new kind of student thinking, it did not explore the influence of teacher scaffolding moves. The other two studies using this corpus (Lin et al, 2014, and the present study) explored the benefits of CR on relational thinking.…”
Section: Collaborative Reasoning Approach To Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a concurrent study involving 36 discussions from the same corpus as the present study, Lin et al (2014) reported an individual growth curve model of changes in students' relational thinking across 10 CR discussions over a 5-week period. Relational think ing was operationalized as use of an explicit linguistic marker for relational thinking, such as BECAUSE.…”
Section: Relational Thinking In Collaborative Reasoning Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The current study is one of several new studies that seek to answer these questions using the same extensive corpus of 180 CR discussions running to over 31,000 turns of speaking. Given the richness of our data set, over the past years our research team has conducted four microgenetic studies (Jadallah et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2012Lin et al, , 2014 and the current study). Each of the studies has targeted different aspects of these questions.…”
Section: Collaborative Reasoning Approach To Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-status children generated more relational thinking and provided more support and refutation to their peers. However, Lin et al (2014) did not take teacher influences into consideration.…”
Section: Relational Thinking In Collaborative Reasoning Discussionmentioning
This study examined the influence of teachers' instructional moves on students' relational thinking during small-group collaborative discussions. One hundred and twenty 4th grade students and 6 teachers participated in a series of 10 discussions, generating a video-recorded corpus containing 32,511 turns for speaking. A microanalysis of a subset of the corpus showed that teacher prompts for relational thinking, rather than lower level prompts or prompts for evaluation, had an immediate effect on student relational thinking, triggering further relational thinking from students over several speaking turns. Students were unlikely to emulate a teacher's relational thinking strategy but highly likely to emulate another student's. Behavioral management but not cognitive management increased the likelihood of relational thinking. Specific praise for cognitive or social strategies enhanced relational thinking, and the bidirectional association between praise and relational thinking sug gested a transactional model of teacher-student interaction. The results underscore the importance of teacher influences in peer collaboration, even when the absolute rate of teacher talk is low.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.