2013
DOI: 10.1002/aic.14244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer of a nanoparticle product between different mixers using latent variable model inversion

Abstract: An experimental nanoparticle preparation process by solvent displacement in passive mixers is considered. The problem under investigation is to estimate the operating conditions in a target device (Mixer B) in order to obtain a product of assigned properties that has already been manufactured in a source device of different geometry (Mixer A). A large historical database is available for Mixer A, whereas a limited historical database is available for Mixer B. The difference in device geometries causes a differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the pharmaceutical industries, the use of LVMbased (feedforward) controllers was pioneered by García-Muñoz et al [51]. The authors designed four controllers for a high shear [63] wet granulation process: a pure feedforward controller based on the raw materials properties (the particle size distribution of the initial dry blend), and three mid-course correction controllers that adjusted the water addition rate and the impeller speed at a given decision point (1/3 of the way through the water addition step). The difference among the three mid-course correction controllers was the set of measurements used as inputs to evaluate the control moves: (1) temperature and power consumption profiles up to the decision point; (2) NIR spectra collected up to the decision points; (3) temperature and power consumption profiles and NIR spectra together.…”
Section: Process Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the pharmaceutical industries, the use of LVMbased (feedforward) controllers was pioneered by García-Muñoz et al [51]. The authors designed four controllers for a high shear [63] wet granulation process: a pure feedforward controller based on the raw materials properties (the particle size distribution of the initial dry blend), and three mid-course correction controllers that adjusted the water addition rate and the impeller speed at a given decision point (1/3 of the way through the water addition step). The difference among the three mid-course correction controllers was the set of measurements used as inputs to evaluate the control moves: (1) temperature and power consumption profiles up to the decision point; (2) NIR spectra collected up to the decision points; (3) temperature and power consumption profiles and NIR spectra together.…”
Section: Process Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomba et al [63] investigated the problem of transferring the production of polymer nanoparticles (to be used as drug carriers for controlled drug delivery) by solvent displacement in passive mixers between two devices of different size. The problem was complicated by the fact that the target device could only be run under a setup that was different from that under which the available historical dataset had been obtained.…”
Section: Scale-up and Product Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, efforts were devoted to the development of analytical solutions that allow to move the knowledge acquired from one site or data source to another where our interest is focused, such as in the activities of scale-up, product transfer, and process monitoring. , A variety of model transfer approaches were developed for handling specifically spectroscopic data. Techniques such as partial least-squares (PLS) model inversion, Joint-Y PLS, calibration/model transfer, ,, and, more recently, transfer learning ,,, and domain adaptation offer different paths to achieve the aforementioned goals. These methods address partially the aforementioned challenge of connecting multiple sites, but their objective is not to provide a global management platform but instead a way to transfer existing knowledge to a new context of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ruiz et al, 2018), similar to the one in Lakshminarayanan et al (Lakshminarayanan et al, 2000) but for inverting PLS2 models. The use of PLS model inversion for product formulation is also noteworthy, especially in the context of Process Analytical Technology with pharmaceutical processes (Tomba et al, 2014;Bano et al, 2017;Palací-López et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%